Dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatment

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2019, Vol 14, Issue 4

Abstract

People experience fair and unfair treatment daily, and at times may react by breaking ethical rules and lying. Here, we assess the extent to which individuals engage in dishonest behavior aimed at helping or harming others after they experience (un)fair treatment. Across three financially incentivized experiments, recipients in a dictator game received a fair or unfair amount and then could, by means of dishonesty, inflate or deflate their counterparts’ pay. Results show that dishonest helping is a common and robust behavior. Individuals lie to help others after fair, unfair, and no prior treatment. Dishonest harming, however, is less prevalent. Only after unfair treatment, some, but not all, individuals engage in dishonest harming. Dishonest harming was associated with high levels of anger and disappointment, and low levels of gratitude. Interestingly, the source of (un)fairness, whether it is intentional or not, did not attenuate peoples’ behavior, suggesting that dishonest reactions to (un)fairness were driven by the mere (un)fair treatment, and not by a motivation to reciprocate an (un)fair counterpart.

Authors and Affiliations

Margarita Leib, Simone Moran and Shaul Shalvi

Keywords

Related Articles

Prospect theory, reference points, and health decisions

In preventative health decisions, such as the decision to undergo an invasive screening test or treatment, people may be deterred from selecting the test because its perceived disutility relative to not testing is greate...

Enactment of one-to-many communication may induce self-focused attention that leads to diminished perspective taking: The case of Facebook

Social networking sites (SNSs) provide users with an efficient interface for distributing information, such as photos or wall posts, to many others simultaneously. We demonstrated experimentally that this type of indiscr...

To give or not to give: Parental experience and adherence to the Food and Drug Administration warning about over-the-counter cough and cold medicine usage

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned against administering over-the-counter cough and cold medicines to children under 2. This study evaluated whether experienced parents show poorer adherence to the FDA warning...

Reluctant altruism and peer pressure in charitable giving

Subjects donate individually (control group) or in pairs (treatment group). Those in pairs reveal their donation decision to each other. Average donations in the treatment group are significantly higher than in the contr...

How do individuals evaluate and respond to pro-equality decision makers? It depends on joint outcome and Social Value Orientation

The current studies investigated how a manipulation in joint outcome influenced individuals’ responses to pro-equality/individualistic decision makers. In Study 1 (N = 175), we examined the impact of whether equal distri...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678428
  • DOI -
  • Views 136
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Margarita Leib, Simone Moran and Shaul Shalvi (2019). Dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatment. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(4), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-678428