DISTINGUISHING DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES FROM COLONIAL BUREAUS EXERCISING SOFT POWER: REFORMING IMPERIAL ECONOMICS AND ITS ADMINISTRATION*

Journal Title: Journal of Globalization Studies - Year 2016, Vol 7, Issue 1

Abstract

This article offers a method for examining the actual functions of agencies that identify as doing ‘development’ work, both overseas and domestically, in a way that helps to separate two areas of legitimate functions – development as defined under international legal instruments and ‘disaster management’ (along with relief, poverty reduction, and global risks to health and climate) – from inappropriate or illegal activities that fit various definitions of colonialism (including internal) and imperialism in contemporary globalization. Quick applications can be used to screen several international and domestic ‘development’ organizations to suggest partial or serious deviations from their stated missions. Use of a two-part test suggests that most international organizations, government ‘development’ agencies, and agencies with domestic roles for ‘development’ are failing to separate disaster management functions from development and/or are pursuing colonial policies under the guise of development. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is offered as a brief case study.

Authors and Affiliations

David Lempert

Keywords

Related Articles

Chinese and Western Values: Reflections on the Methodology of a Cross-Cultural Dialogue

Value systems – although they come across today in a legified way as a ‘rule of law’ in Western societies – have their origins in religious traditions. Christian ideas and values still form the basis of Western societies...

FOREIGN TRADE BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE BALKANS IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL GEOSTRATEGIC RELATIONS

Russia has been historically, politically, spiritually, and culturally present at the Balkans for centuries. That is why the relations between Russia and the Balkans have a rich and long tradition. Divisions, wars, econo...

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: DOES GLOBALIZATION ACT AS FACILITATOR?

Globalization has brought countries closer in terms of business, trade, tech-nology, knowledge, policies and relations. Globalization, which is partly synonymous with rising international trade, has fostered rapid produc...

THE SECOND AXIAL AGE AND METAMORPHOSES OF RELIGIOUS CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE ‘CHRISTIAN WORLD’

Departing from Karl Jaspers's prominent conception of the 800–200 BCE as the Axial Age, the author argues that from the late 15th century and especially from the mid-18th century up to now the world is experiencing the s...

A NEW THEORY OF MONETARY LONG CYCLES UNDER SCRUTINY OF FIRST ROUND EMPIRICAL TESTS

In the present article the author reconsiders the theories of long monetary cycles by Marjolin (1941) and Dupriez (1966) in order to update their practical application to the 21st century. This leads to the recommendatio...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP263040
  • DOI -
  • Views 100
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

David Lempert (2016). DISTINGUISHING DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES FROM COLONIAL BUREAUS EXERCISING SOFT POWER: REFORMING IMPERIAL ECONOMICS AND ITS ADMINISTRATION*. Journal of Globalization Studies, 7(1), 87-111. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-263040