ДО ПРОБЛЕМИ САМОІДЕНТИФІКАЦІЇ ФІЛОСОФІЇ В УКРАЇНІ ПОЧАТКУ ХХ ст.
Journal Title: Науковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету імені Юрія Федьковича. Серія: філософія - Year 2017, Vol 1, Issue 791
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of philosophy in Ukraine in the early 20th century, on the example of Kyiv religious-philosophical (1908-1919) and Kyiv scientific and philosophical (1914-1919) societies, with the participation of the professors of the University of St. Volodymyr and Kyiv Theological Academy. The main attention is paid to the study of the philosophical thought self-identification during this period, that is, the discovery of the way the philosophers themselves identified their views, which intellectual streams were considered to be philosophical ones. For this purpose, a detailed analysis of the topics and texts of the reports read at the meetings of the Kyiv Philosophical Societies are reproduced. In addition, the factors that caused the meaning of the transformation of the philosophy of that time have been singled out. They were as follows: recognition of part of the philosophical community of Orthodoxy as the basis of national culture, the crisis of European rationalism, World War I. As a result of the research, it has been found out that the search for the identity of philosophy in Ukraine in the early 20th century, in particular, connected to Kyiv, took place in two directions: firstly, because of comprehension of the present and the history of the native philosophical thought, the isolation of that part based on the Orthodox doctrine as the basis for the formation of a Christian (more precise, Orthodox) philosophy, as well as through a certain distance from Western philosophy as a component of culture based on other ideological foundations - Catholic Change and Protestantism; and secondly, because of the recognition of the commonality of the European philosophical tradition, which did not exclude criticism of Western philosophy, the search for its own solutions to the crisis problems that were characteristic of it at that time. It has been shown that both directions had undergone a certain correction during World War, I not only because of the non-Slavophilic tendencies inherent in the part of the philosophical community, but also through the declarations contained in the treatment of the German scholars "To the Cultural World," where the Orthodox actually were taken out of the boundaries of European civilization.
Authors and Affiliations
Наталія Філіпенко
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP312104
- DOI -
- Views 130
- Downloads 0
СМЫСЛ И ЗНАЧЕНИЕ
All concepts are based on sense; all definit ions are generated and formed by sense. Conceptual elements are distinguished by their sense within specific contexts of sense. Further, there is no clear distinction between...
PARADOJAS DE LA LIBERTAD EN LA FILOSOFÍA ESPAÑOLA CONTEMPORÁNEA
The liberal tendency incorporated in Spain by influence of the French Enlightenment produced in contemporary Spanish thought (19th and 20th centuries) an inverted dialectic between tradition and modernity, of which are f...
ЕТИКА НЕНАСИЛЛЯ В КОНТЕКСТІ СУЧАСНИХ ПРОЦЕСІВ ГЛОБАЛІЗАЦІЇ
Sahanovska T. Ethics of Nonviolence in the Context of Modern Globalization Process. Modern processes of globalization of planetary scale are measured by researchers and scientists ambiguous. On the one hand, fixed ideals...
THE PLACE OF CULTURE IN THE "WAVE MODEL" OF HISTORICAL CHANGES
The article analyzes the concept of the "wave" model of E. Toffler history. The main position of the study is fixation and characterization of the three "waves" of history. With the "third wave", modernity arises, with i...
INTERRELATIONS OF SYNCHRONIC AND DIACHRONIC ASPECTS IN YURI LOTMAN’S SEMIOTICS
The authors of the article analyze the peculiarities of Yu. Lotman’s semiotics. In the article, it is deducted that his theory of semiosphere was based on the critic examination and development of the system and structur...