Duty of judge (judicial immunity): actual problems of legal regulation and practice application

Journal Title: Правова позиція - Year 2018, Vol 1, Issue

Abstract

The paper analyzes the latest constitutional mechanism for regulating the judge’s immunity. In the context of the study, the legal positions of the High Council for Justice (HCJ) regarding the removal of judicial immunity, which were reflected in relevant decisions for 2017, were analyzed. The author argues that domestic legislation needs some adjustments. In particular, the HCJ acting as a judicial (judicial) authority must establish whether the evidence presented by the party proves the circumstances, which indicate: 1) the existence of reasonable suspicion of committing a criminal offense by a judge suspected of a criminal offense; 2) the presence of sufficient grounds to believe that there is at least one of the risks stipulated in Article 177 of the CPC of Ukraine; 3) insufficiency of the use of milder preventive measures to prevent the risk or risks specified in the petition. The HCJ, in matters of removal of judge immunity, should perform judicial control function, and its decision to consent to the detention of a judge, his detention or arrest should be directly applicable, without further decisions of the investigating judge. An unjustified and unnecessary imposition (lay-out) of two jurisdictional jurisdictions: the HCJ and local courts (investigating judges) on judicial control in the detention and taking of judges in custody is considered to be groundless and unnecessary

Authors and Affiliations

С. В. Прилуцький

Keywords

Related Articles

Republic of Belarus. Restricted information mode. Confidential information and secrets

The issue of access of citizens and legal entities to information of limited access is being considered. Analyzed international treaties, regulatory legal acts of the Republic of Belarus governing the issues of access to...

Social insecurity individual customs officials of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine, who commits the abuse of power or position, and the consequences of his actions

Scientific research was devoted to consideration of the most important aspects of the abuse of power or position (social danger of the crime and the person who commits  customs officials).

Problems of interaction of subjects of formation and subjects of the realization of state anti-corruption policy

On the way to integration into the European Community, Ukraine has undertaken a number of commitments, with a priority of which there is an effective, uncompromising and continuous fight against corruption, which impedes...

Administrative and legal status of administrative commissions

The article contains an analysis of the problems associated with the determination of the administrative and legal status of certification commissions in Ukraine. Attestation in the work is considered as an assessment pr...

Methods of public administration of legal relations in the field of intellectual property: concept and classification

The essence of methods of public administration by the sphere of intellectual property is analyzed. Classification of methods of public administration by sphere of intellectual property is carried out. The peculiarities...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP600677
  • DOI -
  • Views 79
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

С. В. Прилуцький (2018). Duty of judge (judicial immunity): actual problems of legal regulation and practice application. Правова позиція, 1(), 111-119. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-600677