Efficacy of Epidural 0.75% Ropivacaine vs. Epidural 0.5% Bupivacaine for Adult Patients undergoing Major Lower Abdominal Surgeries: A Double Blind Randomized Control Study
Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 7
Abstract
Context: In view of the wider application of regional anesthetic procedure in modern anaesthesia practice, there is a need for local anesthetic with desirable properties like longer duration of sensory blockade for post operative analgesia and moderate duration of motor paralysis for surgical relaxation. Null hypothesis: Epidurally administered 20 ml of 0.75% Ropivacaine is not effective in comparison to 20 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine for major lower abdominal surgeries in adult patients. Aims: To study the efficacy of epidurally administered 20 ml of 0.75% Ropivacaine in comparison to 20 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine for major lower abdominal surgeries in adult patients. Settings and design: Hospital based double blind randomized controlled study carried out at Department of Anesthesiology, Shadan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad. Methods: 50 eligible patients were included. They were divided into two groups of 25 each randomly. Group R with 25 patients were given 20 ml of 0.75% Ropivacaine epidurally. Group B with 25 patients were given 20 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine epidurally. Results: There was no statistically significant difference among the two groups in terms of duration, quality and onset of sensory as well as motor blockade. Post operative analgesia duration was also similar among them. Two groups did not differ significantly in terms of side effects and hemodynamic stability. (p value > 0.05; statistically insignificant). Conclusion: Our study concluded that 20 ml of 0.75% epidural Ropivacaine produced equally effective and good quality as well as duration of sensory and motor blockade and post operative analgesia when compared to 20 ml of 0.5% epidural Bupivacaine for various lower abdominal surgeries.
Authors and Affiliations
Prardhana Veerabathula
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP535349
- DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5718.20
- Views 77
- Downloads 0
Preventive Analgesic Efficacy of Intravenous Tramadol Versus Intravenous Nalbuphine for Elective Inguinal Hernia Repair Surgeries :Randomised Controlled Trial
Background Information: One of the challenges in postoperative care in a developing country is the non-availability of narcotics. Morphine and fentanyl have excellent analgesic action but they are difficult procure as th...
A Study on Haemodynamic and Adverse Effects of Intramuscular Parecoxib in Adults for Postoperative Pain Relief
Background: Postoperative pain control is generally best managed by anaesthesiologists since they offer regional anaesthetic techniques as well as pharmacological expertise in analgesics.Various postoperative analgesic m...
Comparative Study of Epidural Ropivacaine HCL-Fentanyl Citrate and Ropivacaine HCL-Tramadol HCL for Postoperative Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries
Introduction: Central neuraxial adjuvant drugs, alone or in combination, are used intrathecally or epidurally for the treatment of acute and chronic painful conditions. Aims: To compare the efficacy and duration of anal...
A Comparison of Dexmedetomidine with Thiopentone Sodium Versus Esmolol with Thiopentone Sodium to Attenuate the Hemodynamic Stress Responses after Electroconvulsive Therapy
Modified electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) under anesthesia is an important in the treatment of severe, persistent depression; bipolar disorder and schizophrenia; especially resistant cases. However, it is commonly associa...
The Evaluation of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway as an Alternative to Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Context: Proseal laryngeal mask airway is a supraglottic airway device with an additional drainage tube and a dorsal cuff which provides better seal and prevents aspiration. Aims: 1) tocompare the efficacy of PLMA with...