Endoscopic Mucosal Resection after Circumferential Mucosal Incision of Large Colorectal Tumors: Comparison With Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Journal Title: International Journal of Cancer Studies & Research (IJCR) - Year 2013, Vol 2, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic mucosal resection is widely used for treating superficial colorectal carcinomas or premalignant colorectal tumors. Piecemeal resection and local recurrence are frequent with endoscopic mucosal resection for >20-mm-diameter tumors. Endoscopic submucosal dissection, which facilitates en bloc resection of large colorectal tumors, is useful for superficial colorectal tumors. In our hospital, endoscopic mucosal resection after circumferential mucosal incision was used for colorectal tumorswith a diameter of 20–30 mm. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection after circumferential mucosal incision. Design: Retrospective clinical trial at a single center Settings: ShigaUniversity of Medical Science Patients: 77 colorectal tumors (69 patients) with a diameter of 20–30 mmendoscopically treated between January 2010 and May2012 at Shiga University of Medical Science. Interventions: Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection after circumferential mucosal incision. Main Outcome Measures: En bloc resection rate, procedure time, complications Results: ESD was associated with longer procedure times compared with C-EMR (p < 0.005). En bloc resection, complete curative resection, and perforation rates were similar in both groups Delayed bleeding was limited to the ESD group (2.1%).Histopathological analysis revealed that the incidence of adenoma was lower in the ESD group than in the C-EMR group(p= 0). Mucosal cancer was more frequent in the ESD group(p= 0). The nonlifting sign was seen in 16.7% patients with laterally spreading tumors of nongranular type in the en blocCEMR group and 100% patients with laterally spreading tumors of nongranular type in the piecemeal C-EMR group (p = 0.035). Limitations: A single-centerretrospective study Conclusions: C-EMRand ESD were equally effective for treating colorectal tumors with a diameter of 20–30 mm.

Authors and Affiliations

Yosuke Mochizuki

Keywords

Related Articles

Modeling and Simulation of EGF-CSF-1 pathway to Investigate Glioma - Macrophage Interaction in Brain Tumors

Glioblastoma multiform (GBM) is one of the most lethal forms of brain cancers. The biggest difficulties for diagnostics and treatment of GBM underlie in its dynamic and complex macro and microenvironment. Glioma cells, s...

Kaposi Sarcoma of Spleen in HIV-Negative Patient Detected with F-18 FDG PET/CT

We report a case of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) who presented with unusual clinical features. The unusual clinical features were abscence of detectable HIV, absence of cutaneous lesion and presence of a splenic mass. F-18 FDG PE...

Are there any Dermoscopic Signs of Primary Cutaneous Follicular Center B-cell Lymphoma?

Cutaneous follicular center B-cell lymphoma is an indolent tumor that arise on head or neck. Histology by immunotyping with monoclonal antibodies in frozen or paraffin - embedded tissue is necessary for diagnosis. The tu...

Intracystic Papillary Carcinoma of The Breast a Rare Tumor in Male

Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast in men is an extremely rare disease with an excellent prognosis. Here, we report a new case of intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast in a 79- year-old man. He was adm...

Serum Lipid Fractions and Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review of Current Literature

Serum Lipid Fractions and Renal Cell Carcinoma Kidney cancer is among the most common human malignancies. In 2008, 273, 518 new cases of kidney cancer were diagnosed throughout the world, representing 2.8% of the worldwi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP197898
  • DOI 10.19070/2167-9118-130003
  • Views 95
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Yosuke Mochizuki (2013). Endoscopic Mucosal Resection after Circumferential Mucosal Incision of Large Colorectal Tumors: Comparison With Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. International Journal of Cancer Studies & Research (IJCR), 2(2), 17-25. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-197898