Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 6

Abstract

We designed an experiment to test the robustness of Dana, Weber, and Kuang’s (DWK), 2007 results. DWK observed that, when participants were given a “costless” way — the click of a button — to ignore the consequences of their actions on others’ payoffs, they chose to remain ignorant and fair behavior diminished. By implementing a double-blind experiment together with a design that controls for alternative explanations for the observed behavior, we confirmed DWK’s findings.

Authors and Affiliations

Tara Larson and C. Monica Capra

Keywords

Related Articles

“Leaving it to chance”—Passive risk taking in everyday life

While risk research focuses on actions that put people at risk, this paper introduces the concept of “passive risk”—risk brought on or magnified by inaction. We developed a scale measuring personal tendency for passive r...

A marketing science perspective on recognition-based heuristics (and the fast-and-frugal paradigm)

Marketing science seeks to prescribe better marketing strategies (advertising, product development, pricing, etc.). To do so we rely on models of consumer decisions grounded in empirical observations. Field experience su...

The value of victory: social origins of the winner’s curse in common value auctions

Auctions, normally considered as devices facilitating trade, also provide a way to probe mechanisms governing one’s valuation of some good or action. One of the most intriguing phenomena in auction behavior is the winner...

Coherence and correspondence in the psychological analysis of numerical predictions: How error-prone heuristics are replaced by ecologically valid heuristics

Numerical predictions are of central interest for both coherence-based approaches to judgment and decisions — the Heuristic and Biases (HB) program in particular — and to correspondence-based approaches — Social Judgment...

Memory retrieval processes help explain the incumbency advantage

Voters prefer political candidates who are currently in office (incumbents) over new candidates (challengers). Using the premise of query theory (Johnson, Häubl & Keinan, 2007), we clarify the underlying cognitive mechan...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677702
  • DOI -
  • Views 185
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Tara Larson and C. Monica Capra (2009). Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(6), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-677702