Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 6

Abstract

We designed an experiment to test the robustness of Dana, Weber, and Kuang’s (DWK), 2007 results. DWK observed that, when participants were given a “costless” way — the click of a button — to ignore the consequences of their actions on others’ payoffs, they chose to remain ignorant and fair behavior diminished. By implementing a double-blind experiment together with a design that controls for alternative explanations for the observed behavior, we confirmed DWK’s findings.

Authors and Affiliations

Tara Larson and C. Monica Capra

Keywords

Related Articles

Moral pluralism on the trolley tracks: Different normative principles are used for different reasons in justifying moral judgments

The psychological correlates of utilitarian choices in sacrificial moral dilemmas are contentious. In the literature, some research (Greene, et al., 2001) suggested that utilitarianism requires analytic thinking while ot...

Toward understanding everyday decision making by adults across the autism spectrum

We focus on the everyday decision making challenges faced by high functioning adults across the Autism Spectrum using both between- and within-group comparisons. We used Mturk, backed by a combination of recruiting and s...

Gambler’s fallacy, hot hand belief, and the time of patterns

The gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand belief have been classified as two exemplars of human misperceptions of random sequential events. This article examines the times of pattern occurrences where a fair or biased coin...

Image Theory’s counting rule in clinical decision making: Does it describe how clinicians make patient-specific forecasts?

The field of clinical decision making is polarized by two predominate views. One holds that treatment recommendations should conform with guidelines; the other emphasizes clinical expertise in reaching case-specific judg...

Using the ACT-R architecture to specify 39 quantitative process models of decision making

Hypotheses about decision processes are often formulated qualitatively and remain silent about the interplay of decision, memorial, and other cognitive processes. At the same time, existing decision models are specified...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677702
  • DOI -
  • Views 176
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Tara Larson and C. Monica Capra (2009). Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(6), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-677702