Faces of Cenzorship. Freedom of Opinion and Creativity in Terms of Market Oriented Society

Journal Title: In Medias Res - Year 2016, Vol 5, Issue 9

Abstract

Heresy and orthodoxy are immanent to all regimes, totalitarian and democratic. Denying of critical thinking manifests itself in so far as the regime feels threatened by opponents, and censorship, systematic control of freedom of thought is an integral part of running the state. Control increases in times of crisis. With the development of society, methods become less transparent. In developed democracies, the most effective control is thought control, and big monitoring systems, together with the systems of indoctrination (media, education, religion), are involved in it. Systems of indoctrination teach us what to think and what values to represent. Refusal withdraws sanctions. What is not in accordance, is placed in the domain of the ban. In developed democracies, censorship is prohibited by law, but is carried out in other ways. Self-censorship, the reaction of authors to the repression, and the so-called.”silent censorship”, is ignoring and thus removing undesirable contents, instead of the previous prohibition and criminal prosecution. Today all aspects of human creativity are regulated by the market, the intention is total control. The public space is filled with trivia and entertainment, for research and creative contents a “demand” is absent, and thus the space in the media.

Authors and Affiliations

Vesna Ivezić

Keywords

Related Articles

Drones as Media of New Perception of Reality in the 21st Century - Connecting of Creativity and Military Objectives

Unfortunately, drones or unmanned aerial vehicle were used previously in reality and media descriptions mostly in war situations when innocent civilians were killed. But, human creativity, research and artistic spirit ch...

About Freedom, Determinism and Technodeterminism

What is ‘technological determinism’? Was Marshall McLuhan a ‘technological determinist’? The text compares different meanings of the term ‘determinism’. The text wants to show that the media philosophy warns of media inf...

The Media mediation of God

The place and role of Regis Debraya in creating a realistic picture of media and media mediation - are not well known in our philosophical media circles, or circles of particular media theories. Particularly in his teach...

Contemporary practice of presentation: new tendencies in showing the cultural heritage

Because of its symbolic meaning, the cultural and historical heritage has a specific value for the modern generations, since it forms the identity and shapes the collective and individual culture of memory. It is of grea...

The Media In-between Corporate and Messianic Cultural Politics

Jurgen Habermas reminds us that the communication mind exists in its two forms... As an emancipatory communication mind, then it realizes the repair of the world and consciousness.But he can also exist as a form of his d...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP466861
  • DOI -
  • Views 58
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Vesna Ivezić (2016). Faces of Cenzorship. Freedom of Opinion and Creativity in Terms of Market Oriented Society. In Medias Res, 5(9), 1421-1438. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-466861