Facing expectations: Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard.

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 6

Abstract

We argue that people choosing prosocial distribution of goods (e.g., in dictator games) make this choice because they do not want to disappoint their partner rather than because of a direct preference for the chosen prosocial distribution. The chosen distribution is a means to fulfil one’s partner’s expectations. We review the economic experiments that corroborate this hypothesis and the experiments that deny that beliefs about others’ expectations motivate prosocial choice. We then formulate hypotheses about what types of expectation motivate someone to do what is expected: these are justifiable hopeful expectations that are clearly about his own choices. We experimentally investigate how people modulate their prosociality when they face low or unreasonably high expectations. In a version of a dictator game, we provide dictators with the opportunity to modulate their transfer as a function of their partner’s expectations. We observe that a significant portion of the population is willing to fulfil their partner’s expectation provided that this expectation expresses a reasonable hope. We conclude that people are averse to disappointing and we discuss what models of social preferences can account for the role of expectations in determining prosocial choice, with a special attention to models of guilt aversion and social esteem.

Authors and Affiliations

Christophe Heintz, Jérémy Celse, Francesca Giardini and Sylvain Max

Keywords

Related Articles

Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk

Although Mechanical Turk has recently become popular among social scientists as a source of experimental data, doubts may linger about the quality of data provided by subjects recruited from online labor markets. We addr...

An exploration of the motivational basis of take-some and give-some games

Surprisingly little research has investigated the particular motives that underlie choice behavior in social dilemma situations. The main aim of the present research was to ask whether behavior in take-some games (such a...

It pays to be nice, but not really nice: Asymmetric reputations from prosociality across 7 countries

Cultures differ in many important ways, but one trait appears to be universally valued: prosociality. For one’s reputation, around the world, it pays to be nice to others. However, recent research with American participa...

Variations on anchoring: Sequential anchoring revisited

The anchoring effect, the assimilation of judgment toward a previously considered value, has been shown using various experimental paradigms. We used several variations of the sequential anchoring paradigm, in which a nu...

Nudge to nobesity I: Minor changes in accessibility decrease food intake

Very small but cumulated decreases in food intake may be sufficient to erase obesity over a period of years. We examine the effect of slight changes in the accessibility of different foods in a pay-by-weight-of-food sala...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678211
  • DOI -
  • Views 128
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Christophe Heintz, Jérémy Celse, Francesca Giardini and Sylvain Max (2015). Facing expectations: Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard.. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(6), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-678211