Favorable and Unfavorable Conditions for Innovation: Some Cross Country Evidence
Journal Title: Asian Economic and Financial Review - Year 2012, Vol 2, Issue 1
Abstract
The paper employs cross country regression analysis to estimate the effect of democracy and income inequality, adjusting for the level of income and other variables, on country innovation. It finds that both of these variables are of consequence for innovation. Different countries innovate at different rates. Some countries are very creative while other countries are not. Innovation is of vital importance to economic activity. The long term health of the economy depends on innovation, as creativity and innovation are the key drivers of economic growth. Understanding the determinants of creativity and innovation is, therefore, a serious endeavor. While it is common to study the reasons for differences in creativity and innovation across firms and countries by knowledge production function inputs such as dollar expenditure on research and development, looking for more fundamental underlying socio-political variables at the country level that may lead to a more favorable or less favorable environmental conditions for innovation is less common. National socio-political country conditions are not the direct determinants of innovation such as those at the firm level, but, rather, they are the behind the scenes forces influencing the development of these direct components. For instance, greater freedom and democracy may create individuals who are more autonomous, independent, and entrepreneurial. If, at the firm level, certain corporate cultural characteristics are the key to innovation, then some country characteristics will provide a more favorable milieu for their evolution and appearance, while others will not. The purpose of this paper is to focus on two socio-political variables, democracy and income inequality, as potential determinants of innovation. In pursuit of this undertaking, the paper is divided into five parts. The first part looks at potential theoretical reasons why democracy and income inequality and a few other country variables may have relevance for innovation. The second section discusses the measures that are employed in the empirical analysis and identifies data sources. The third part shows the outcomes of regression runs on innovation and democracy and on innovation and income inequality adjusting for the level of economic development and for other variables. The final section concludes.
Authors and Affiliations
William R. DiPietro| Professor of Economics Daemen College 4380 Main St. Amherst
ASIA PACIFIC ADRS IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM: IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN PERFORMANCE FOR ISSUES LISTED ON THE NYSE IN THE LAST TWO DECADES?
The long-term excess returns for Asia Pacific ADRs listed on the NYSE from 1990 through 2009 are tested to determine differences in performance and evidence of decade-long market timing effects. While the overall sample...
FURNITURE INDUSTRY IN TURKEY DUE TO PRODUCT AND PROCESS ADDITIONAL WORK OR THE SCOPE OF THE METHOD
The primary objective of work study techniques to increase productivity and conduct in this context is to reduce costs. However, the result of work-study techniques not only intended to provide a benefit to the company,...
DETERMINANTS OF EXPORTS COMPETITIVENESS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS THROUGH REVEALED COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE OF EXTERNAL SECTOR OF PAKISTAN
In this paper, we have endeavored to analyze a sector-wise export performance of Pakistan using Revealed Comparative Advantage with the global market. Data for the period 2003-2015, Harmonized System (HS) 1988/92 develop...
A CAUSALITY TEST ON THE GIBSON PARADOX IN TURKEY
In general, it is believed that interest rate is an important instrument for central banks while struggling with inflation. However, Gibson Paradox tells the story in a different way. So how does it work in reality? This...
THE DETERMINANTS OF MARKET EMPLOYMENT CAPACITY OF ENTERPRISES IN JIGAWA STATE OF NIGERIA
This paper examines the determinants of market employment capacity of enterprises in Jigawa state, we used primary data collected from 300 entrepreneurs drawn base on purposive and random sampling techniques from three m...