Feasibility study of different methods of energy extraction from Ardabil urban waste

Journal Title: Journal of Research in Biology - Year 2018, Vol 8, Issue 3

Abstract

In this research costs and revenues of each technology in economic and environmental scenarios are studied and in order to compare technologies economically, present net value method (the ratio of present net benefits to costs) in six scenarios are used. As a result, the highest revenues (by avoiding environmental cost related to electricity production of 115.72 dollar on tone and without avoided environmental cost related to electricity production 86.87) are related to anaerobic digestion technology and the highest present net value of benefits to costs in first scenario is related to the anaerobic digestion of 1.10 dollars on tone (without environmental costs, electricity revenues, fertilizer and CDM) and in the second scenario it is related to anaerobic digestion of 1.15 dollar on tone (without environmental cost and revenues from electricity, fertilizer and CDM sale) and in the third scenario it is related to anaerobic technology (with environmental cost and revenues from electricity sale). Municipal wastes are byproduct of social life which its correct management is one of the main concerns of urban and national authorities. On the other hand environmental problems caused by such practices such as greenhouse gas emission and production of pollutants have attracted the attention of International organizations and countries’ authorities to waste management. Energy production from wastes is one of the selected solutions of urban managers in the area of sustainable management of wastes. In the fourth scenario it is related to anaerobic digestion of 1.4 dollars on tone with environmental costs and revenues from electricity, fertilizer and CDM and in the fifth scenario it is related to anaerobic digestion of 1.45 dollars on tone with environmental costs and revenues from electricity, fertilizer and CDM. Therefore the most economical technology of anaerobic digestion and gasification technology is type 1 and 2 of waste burning and waste landfill. With respect to environmental comparison of technologies using AHP method and expert choice software the most environmental technology is gasification. In order to combine economic and environmental factors we used the ratio of present net benefits to costs in six scenarios. The most economic and environmental technology is anaerobic digestion technology

Authors and Affiliations

Mohammad Nikbakht, Hossein Saadati, Ebrahim Fataei

Keywords

Related Articles

Diversity and use pattern of ethno-medicinal plants of Kumaun Himalaya

Kumaun Himalaya, in the Indian Himalayan region, has a rich diversity of medicinal plants, which are widely used in traditional medicinal systems. The present paper concludes the diversity, vernacular names, associated a...

Detection of biofilm formation in urinary isolates: need of the hour

The purpose of the study was to estimate biofilm (BF) formation in urinary catheterized patients, by comparing three methods i.e. Tissue culture plate method (TCP), Congo Red Agar method (CRM) and Tube method (TM) and to...

Saprobic status and Bioindicators of the river Sutlej

Saprobic status and bioindicators of river Sutlej was conducted at (S1) Ropar Headworks, (S2) downstream after the confluence with BudhaNallah, (S3) Harike before the confluence with river Beas, (S4) Harike before the co...

Laboratory toxicity evaluation of Diflubenzuron, a chitin-synthesis inhibitor, against Anopheles darlingi (Diptera, Culicidae)

We evaluated Diflubenzuron toxicity against larvae and pupae of Anopheles darlingi. A series of bioassays were developed to assess the lethal concentrations LC50 and LC90 to larvae after two exposure periods (24 and 48 h...

Haematological characteristics of Synodontis nigrita of the lower Niger River

Haematological characteristics of Synodontis nigrita in the lower part of river Niger was studied in the present study. A total of 20 adult Synodontis nigrita was collected at a landing site in the lower part of river Ni...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP569596
  • DOI -
  • Views 74
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mohammad Nikbakht, Hossein Saadati, Ebrahim Fataei (2018). Feasibility study of different methods of energy extraction from Ardabil urban waste. Journal of Research in Biology, 8(3), 2451-2464. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-569596