FEATURES LEGAL STATUS OF OFFICIALS UKRAINE COURT
Journal Title: Порівняльно-аналітичне право - Year 2016, Vol 3, Issue
Abstract
The article deals with the peculiarities of the legal status of judges of Ukraine. The author analyzes the legal status of officers of the courts, the classification of their rights and responsibilities. The author identified shortcomings staffing courts Ukraine and the ways to address them.
Authors and Affiliations
В. С. Декаленко
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP496396
- DOI -
- Views 72
- Downloads 0
THE LEGAL MECHANISM OF THE INCLUSION OF THE ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS IN TO THE STATE REGISTER OF SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTIONS, SUPPORTED BY THE STATE
In the article the concept and purpose of state support scientific institutions. Determined legal mechanism include academic institutions in the State Register of scientific institutions, which receive state support. The...
PUBLIC PROMISE OF AN AWARD: DETERMINATION OF LEGAL NATURE
This article is devoted to analysis of legal nature of public promise of an award. The study focuses on the exploration of relations which occur due to public promise of an award and theoretical analysis of obligations c...
JURISDICTION OF CASES ON APPEAL DECISIONS STATE EXECUTIVE SERVICE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DECISIONS, RULINGS AND REGULATIONS OF COMMERCIAL COURTS UKRAINE: PROBLEM DEFINITION
In the article investigational and the finished off legal questions of determination of jurisdiction of businesses about the appeal of decisions of organs of government executive service in relation to implementation of...
REGARDING THE MAJOR MISTAKES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS DURING PRE-TRIAL INVESTIGATION
The crime investigation is a complex cognitive process that requires the investigator considerable intellectual, organizational, volitional efforts. It should also be noted that the investigator’s activities are carried...
COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: EXPERIENCE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE USA (EXAMPLE OF ROPER V SIMMONS, WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG)
The article is devoted to the analysis of the experience of the US Supreme Court in applying the method of comparative constitutional interpretation. The cases of Roper v Simmons, Washington v. Glucksberg and the approac...