Frameworks for the measurement scales development in mixed methods research

Journal Title: Український соціум - Year 2015, Vol 4, Issue 55

Abstract

The article presents analysis of four mixed methods frameworks for measurement scales development andvalidation. Three of themare presented in English-speaking sources and one–in the domestic: IDCV(A.Onwuegbuzie, R. Bustamante, J. Nelson), MDVR (R. Luyt), PEMI (P.-M. Daigneault, S. Jacob), and TVMS(S.Dembitskii). Common to all approaches is the use of the consistent design. Given the status of the components,approaches are different. IDCV, MDVR and PEMI use the equivalent status of quantitative and qualitativecomponents, while TVMS-approach is based on the dominant status of the qualitative. Another important differencebetween the approaches is the specificity of their iteration. Relatively speaking, the IDCV, MDVR and PEMIiteration, has inductive character–at almost every stage obtained findings may force researchers to adjustmethodology, or to return to a previous stage for its re-implementation. This is precisely defining the specifics of thestage within which the relevant findings were obtained. Regarding TVMS, iteration has rather deductive character–all results are inspected not only with the consideration of the specific phase within which they are derived, but alsowith the consideration of theoretical positions that form the basis of the measuring technique validation and areconsidered to be theoretically valid. Thus, although the approaches and paradigms belong to a mixed type ofresearch, they significantly differ from each other due to the differences of the theoretical and methodologicalprovisions they are based on. So, A. Onwuegbuzie, R. Bustamante, J. Nelson offer a specially crafted approach. R.Luyt uses the concept of measurement validity by R.Adcock and D.Collier. P.-M. Daigneault, S. Jacob insist on thespecial approach in its research efforts after obtaining unexpected results. S. Dembitskii refers to the concept oftheoretical validity.

Authors and Affiliations

Serhii Dembitskyi, Bohdana Khlyapatura

Keywords

Related Articles

Capital flows control: features of innovative approaches and insights for Ukraine

Paper dwells upon the dialectic of liberalization and capital flow controls under the conditions of global transformations. Author clarifies the pros and cons of the international capital flows liberalization for the rec...

The peculiarities of individual religiosity in the context of religious affiliation in modern Ukrainian society

The article is devoted to the peculiarities of individual religiosity in the context of religious identity.The research is based on a three-level structure, where the macro-level is presented by diachronicanalysis of the...

THE INVERSION CHARACTER OF THE PUBLIC MARKET TRANSFORMATIONS

Inversion nature of social reproduction reflected in the market transformation of post-socialist countries as a result of the deployment of capital flows primitive accumulation, restructuring and socialization of the eco...

Social inclusion and exclusion as a form of interaction in society: heuristic potential of sociological concepts

Most of publications that use social exclusion and social inclusionconcepts are confined to social andpolitical issues and are detached from existing sociological theories. The article overcomes this gap and definesheuri...

TRENDS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESMENTS AND EXPECTATIONS OF UKRAINE'S POPULATION: THE YEAR OF 2017

Based on data from a nationwide survey, an assessment is made of the socio-economic situation and social attitudes, as well as the income and expenditures of the population. Trends and structure of savings are considered...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP481886
  • DOI -
  • Views 150
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Serhii Dembitskyi, Bohdana Khlyapatura (2015). Frameworks for the measurement scales development in mixed methods research. Український соціум, 4(55), 37-45. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-481886