Goals and plans in decision making

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 3

Abstract

We propose a constructed-choice model for general decision making. The model departs from utility theory and prospect theory in its treatment of multiple goals and it suggests several different ways in which context can affect choice. It is particularly instructive to apply this model to protective decisions, which are often puzzling. Among other anomalies, people insure against non-catastrophic events, underinsure against catastrophic risks, and allow extraneous factors to influence insurance purchases and other protective decisions. Neither expected-utility theory nor prospect theory can explain these anomalies satisfactorily. To apply this model to the above anomalies, we consider many different insurance-related goals, organized in a taxonomy, and we consider the effects of context on goals, resources, plans and decision rules. The paper concludes by suggesting some prescriptions for improving individual decision making with respect to protective measures.

Authors and Affiliations

David H. Krantz and Howard C. Kunreuther

Keywords

Related Articles

Precise models deserve precise measures: A methodological dissection

The recognition heuristic (RH) — which predicts non-compensatory reliance on recognition in comparative judgments — has attracted much research and some disagreement, at times. Most studies have dealt with whether or und...

Cognition in the woods: Biases in probability judgments by search and rescue planners

A type of emergency decision-making which has not received research attention is the police search for a lost person in a rural or wilderness area. For many such incidents, decisions concerning where to search for the lo...

On the complexity of traffic judges’ decisions

Professional judges in traffic courts sentence many hundreds of offenders per year. Using 639 case files from archives, we compared the Matching Heuristic (MH) to compensatory, weighing algorithms (WM). We modeled and cr...

The default pull: An experimental demonstration of subtle default effects on preferences

The impact of default options on choice is a reliable, well-established behavioral finding. However, several different effects may lend to choosing defaults in an often indistinguishable manner, including loss aversion,...

Is saving lives your task or God’s? Religiosity, belief in god, and moral judgment

Should a Catholic hospital abort a life-threatening pregnancy or let a pregnant woman die? Should a religious employer allow his employees access to contraceptives or break with healthcare legislation? People and organiz...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677576
  • DOI -
  • Views 211
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

David H. Krantz and Howard C. Kunreuther (2007). Goals and plans in decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(3), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-677576