HOBBES’ POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY

Journal Title: Challenges of the Knowledge Society - Year 2013, Vol 3, Issue 0

Abstract

This is basically an attempt at an original conceptual reconstruction of Hobbes’ philosophy as set in Lehiathan, namely one in the view of which Hobbes was neither an atheist nor an absolutist, as the standard interpretation holds, but rather what we could call an agnostical pragmatist (fact which, quite surprisingly, places Hobbes in the company of Burke). More to the point, my basic claim within this paper is that Hobbes was not such an ‘enemy of individual freedom’ as we traditionally hold him to be and that his thought was just as attached to the notion of individual freedom as the later contractualist views. The difference however, arises from the fact that Hobbes, unlike Locke, Rousseau or Kant, was what we could call a voluntaristic determinist and consequently viewed human freedom not so much as ‘unhindered action derived from reflective choice’, but rather as what we could call ‘reasonable fulfillment of the basic human inclinations’ (self-interest). As such, I will analyze the three main focal points of Hobbes’ thought, namely (i) human nature, (ii) the principle of association and (iii) the principle of authority. More specifically I will try to offer a perspective on the link between his voluntaristic determinism, his notion of legitimate absolute coercion (sovereignity) and his political theology (the view that any form of political authority rests on a religious legitimacy) in trying to demonstrate how all these were Hobbes’ specific way of seeking to find individual freedom a place under the sun.

Authors and Affiliations

MHAI NOVAC

Keywords

Related Articles

APPROACHES FOR EVALUATING AND FINANCING INVESTMENT PROJECTS

This article presents the financial investment approach and the investment evaluation methods, which are criteria for assessing both investment projects and their funding sources. An important role in the analysis carrie...

THE DIRECTIVE 85/374/EEC ON DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS: ITS INTERPRETATION BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE

This paper focuses on the interpretation of the European Court of Justice concerning substantive aspects of the Directive 85/374/ECC of July25, 1985, on liability for defective products. Therefore, this work will deal wi...

THE COUPLE’S COST-VALUE PERCEPTION IN THE ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT

In this article, I will talk about the possibility to relate the costs and value created for the client. The customer is not a very precise mathematical model, value for the client will be considered a minimum variable....

CASES IN WHICH THE PATRIMONIAL LIABILITY OF THE EMPLOYER CAN BE ESTABLISHED

The employer’s patrimonial liability can be triggered if the employee was subject to a moral or material prejudice. Most often, the material damage caused to the employee consists in the denial of material rights, case i...

CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE INFLUENCE OF LEGAL COMMUNICATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NATURAL LAW

This article addresses the issue of legal communication within natural law. Law has an important role, in relation to civilization and legal culture and one of the means through which law influences both culture and civi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP141904
  • DOI -
  • Views 142
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

MHAI NOVAC (2013). HOBBES’ POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY. Challenges of the Knowledge Society, 3(0), 1144-1157. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-141904