Identifying dementia as an issue

Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2016, Vol 47, Issue 103

Abstract

Since the formulation of rulings is directly related to the refinement of issues, the present paper aims at outlining the extent of a mental disorder namely dementia, so that from this perspective an acceptable separation between this and other psychiatric disorders can be achieved in the realm of jurisprudence. Evaluation of narratives, comparing jurisprudential rulings issued in the case of people with mental disorders in various chapters of jurisprudence, and the use of methods such as lexical aggregation and subtraction of meanings, form the basis of achieving that objective. In addition, examining literal and technical meanings, as well as the errors of case-sensitive meanings pertaining to identification of the issue have been perceived as inevitable. The study shows that one of the most important factors involved in the making of ambiguous and ineffective rulings in the case of psychiatric patients is the lack of proper understanding of mental disorders and their definitional boundaries. Therefore, it is suggested that before any investigation and articulation of rulings, every mental disorder should be compared with neighboring concepts; so that in addition to a clear understanding of the subject, the intermingling of titles and the articulation of non-efficient rulings can be avoided. Moreover, by drawing a link between mental disorders in jurisprudence and the ones in psychology, an approximation to the images of the two sciences will be made and the question of efficiency of jurisprudential rulings shall also be considered.

Authors and Affiliations

Kaveh Ghobadi, Mohammadreza Elmi

Keywords

Related Articles

Intellect and its Application in Fayḍ Kāshānī’s Jurisprudential Thought

Given the importance of intellect in inference, especially in new issues, it is befitting to study the jurists’ works, such as examining the jurisprudential mode of life (sīra) of Fayḍ Kāshānī as an influential jurist in...

A New Look at Mawlawī (Legislative) and Irshādī (Advisory) and their Methodological Resultant

After determining the status of mawlawī and irshādī and deciding that they are attributes of commands and prohibitions and not attributes of ruling and after giving the opted definition and its advantage over other defin...

A Deliberation on the Application of the Legal Principle of Avoidance (I‘rāḍ)

In this article, aimed at promoting Iranian statutes and increasing their applicatory aspects and for providing more and more financial security of society, the legal rule of i‘rāḍ (avoidance, abandonment) is deliberated...

A Legal Study of Lending Paper Money and the Impact of Inflation on it

Lending money to one another is one of the common transactions among people. The borrowed property is sometimes in the form of the very property itself, such as gold and rice, and sometimes in the form of currency, i.e.,...

Revisiting the authority of “alidjma almadraki” (idjma with known origins)

Non-authority of “alidjma almadraki” (idjma with known origins) is a topic frequently raised in the Usulis’ contemporary literature. In this paper, the authority of “alidjma almadraki” has been studied through revisiting...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP190666
  • DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v47i23.32855
  • Views 88
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kaveh Ghobadi, Mohammadreza Elmi (2016). Identifying dementia as an issue. فقه و اصول, 47(103), 95-117. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-190666