Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferences

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 2

Abstract

We conducted an experimental study on social preferences using dictator games similar to Fehr et al. (2008). Our results show that social preferences differ between subjects who receive low-stakes monetary rewards for their decisions and subjects who consider hypothetical stakes. Our findings indicate that, apart from incentives, gender plays an important role for the categorization of different social preferences.

Authors and Affiliations

Christoph Bühren and Thorben C. Kundt

Keywords

Related Articles

Framing effect in evaluation of others’ predictions

This paper explored how frames influence people’s evaluation of others’ probabilistic predictions in light of the outcomes of binary events. Most probabilistic predictions (e.g., “there is a 75% chance that Denver will w...

The available evidence suggests the percent measure should not be used to study inequality: Reply to Norton and Ariely

In this reply, we reiterate the main point of our 2012 paper, which was that the measure of inequality used by Norton and Ariely (2011) was too difficult for it to yield meaningful results. We describe additional evidenc...

Accounting for reciprocity in negotiation and social exchange

People generally adhere to the norm of reciprocity during both tacit and negotiated exchange. Emotional responses generated from profitable and unprofitable exchange facilitate the formation of motives to settle scores w...

Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation

Individual differences in cognitive abilities and skills can predict normatively superior and logically consistent judgments and decisions. The current experiment investigates the processes that mediate individual differ...

External validity of individual differences in multiple cue probability learning: The case of pilot training

Individuals differ in their ability to deal with unpredictable environments. Could impaired performances on learning an unpredictable cue-criteria relationship in a laboratory task be associated with impaired learning of...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678170
  • DOI -
  • Views 141
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Christoph Bühren and Thorben C. Kundt (2015). Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferences. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(2), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-678170