In patients with advanced ovarian cancer, primary suboptimal surgery has better survival outcome than interval suboptimal surgery

Journal Title: UNKNOWN - Year 2019, Vol 20, Issue 1

Abstract

Objective: It is known that optimal or complete cytoreduction is the most important factor in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to examine the results of patients who did not undergo optimal cytoreduction and to examine subgroup analysis based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Material and Methods: Patients with advanced ovarian cancer and suboptimal surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 99 patients with a median age of 59.0 years (range, 22-87 years) were studied. The median follow-up time was 39±32.7 months, 81 patients (81.8%) died and 18 patients (18.2%) were alive. The five-year survival rate was 27.6%. Of the patients, 37 (37.4%) were underwent surgery after NAC, 62 (62.3%) were primary. More patients with NAC died within 3 years compared with those without NAC (83.9% vs 56.0%) (p=0.015). Patients with NAC had less tumor spread (presence of visible tumor in the upper abdomen during surgery) (29.7% vs 72.6%; p<0.001) and had less overall survival times when compared with patients who underwent primary surgery [median 22.3±1.2; 95% CI: (19.9-24.7) vs (37.5±11.2); 95% CI: (15.4-59.5) months; log rank test p=0.055]. The relationship between overall survival and factors such as age, NAC, presence of metastasis in the upper abdomen, and tumor histology (serous vs. non-serous) were analyzed using univariate cox regression analysis. Of these factors, only NAC was close to significant, but it did not reach significance (p=0.055). Conclusion: NAC reduces tumor burden before surgery in advanced ovarian cancer. The prognosis of patients who are not eligible for optimal surgery despite NAC is worse than in patients who do not receive NAC.

Authors and Affiliations

Alpaslan Kaban, Samet Topuz, Pınar Saip, Hamdullah Sözen, Yavuz Salihoğlu

Keywords

Related Articles

Maternal and perinatal characteristics of small-for-gestational-age newborns: Ten-year experience of a single center

Objective: To analyze the maternal and perinatal characteristics of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) newborns compared with appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) newborns in singleton pregnancies managed at our hospital b...

Analyzing the etiology behind mortality associated with antepartum, intrapartum, and post-partum cases in a tertiary care teaching hospital of West Bengal

Objective: The study was undertaken to understand the causes and circumstances of maternal deaths in West Bengal. Material and Methods: One hundred ten maternal deaths were reported during the period December 2010 throug...

Assesment of pregnancy outcomes among twin pregnancies with single fetal demise regarding chorionicity and fetal death time

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess maternal and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies with single fetal demise in terms of chorionicity and fetal death time. Material and Methods: All deliveries betwee...

The relationship between maternal age, body mass index, and the rate of preterm birth

Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of maternal age and maternal body mass index of early pregnancy on the risk of preterm delivery. Material and Methods: The study included 2.1 million li...

Spontaneous and in vitro fertilization pregnancies have comparable first trimester screening profiles for Down syndrome

Objective: We aimed to compare the first trimester screening profiles of spontaneous (n=972) and in in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies (n=339) in a population of patients who had uncomplicated singleton pregnancies...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP551473
  • DOI 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0015
  • Views 59
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Alpaslan Kaban, Samet Topuz, Pınar Saip, Hamdullah Sözen, Yavuz Salihoğlu (2019). In patients with advanced ovarian cancer, primary suboptimal surgery has better survival outcome than interval suboptimal surgery. UNKNOWN, 20(1), 31-36. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-551473