Internet piracy as a rational choice: evidence from the Becker model and J. S. Coleman’s conception of micro-to-macro transitions

Abstract

According to expert estimation, 33% of informal sector of Ukrainian economy is shaped by piracy. Special 301 reports on copyright protection argue that Ukraine has serious problems with legal regulation of copyright protection. The U.S. federal government suspended the duty-free treatment of Ukrainian goods on December 22, 2017. The main cause of the act was inadequate copyright protection policy in Ukraine. This kind of policy provides favorable context for digital piracy, especially Internet piracy – using the Internet as a tool for illegal consumption of different types of goods (books, music etc.). The research paper deals with internet piracy in Ukraine. Following analysis is based on theory of rational choice with particular attention to the Becker model and James S. Coleman’s conception of micro-to-macro transitions. The principle of utility maximization is a core element of the theory. According to G. Becker, person becomes “criminal” (pirate, in this case) “not because their basic motivation is differ from that of other persons, but because their benefits and costs differ”. The paper focuses on the case of pirate Telegram channel “The Book Depository in Ukrainian” (2035 followers). Pirates donated some money for one print copy of a book, bought it, after that they scanned it and made available in the channel for free. All followers of the channel who donated as well as who did not, got an access for the e-copy. The author explores socio-structural preconditions of internet piracy, negative externalities and provides optimal condition for normative regulation and penalty. From the economic point of view, the optimal regulatory strategy will stultify internet piracy. Negative externalities were calculated according to the “loss function” that was provided by G. Becker for crime (3. 946. 240 UAH). The existing regulatory strategy is not optimal. The formal model for optimal fine (ƒ´´) is ƒ´´=(3*Y)*N, where Y – “income” of pirate after crime, N – number of pirates in the network.

Authors and Affiliations

В. А. Шелухін

Keywords

Related Articles

Сonditions and factors of separatism spreading in Ukraine: ethno-national aspect

Opposition to separatist tendencies in Ukraine is impossible without studying the ethnic composition and dynamics of ethnopolitical development of the country’s regions. Minimization of the conflict-related potential of...

The sexual question and prostitution in the lives of the students of Ukraine under the Russian rule in the 19th – early 20th centuries

The article is devoted to the positive and negative features of the legalization of prostitution in the 19th – early 20th centuries. The author argues that the legalization of prostitution in the Russian Empire was of th...

Relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia in the context of regional security

The article examines the relations between the two leading states of the Middle East, the Islamic Republic of Iran and Saudi Arabia in the context of regional security. The geopolitical contradictions between the two cou...

Administrative and legal procedures and grounds for termination of nationality obtained by its loss in Ukraine

This article is attached to the study of administrative-legal order and one of the reasons for the termination of Ukrainian citizenship - as a result of the loss. The article explores and highlights the essence, content...

The mechanisms of counteraction to information threats of external sources

The effectiveness of the mechanism for ensuring national security is determined primarily by its ability to contribute to the preservation of the unity of nations, the stability of public relations, the protection of nat...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP445511
  • DOI -
  • Views 116
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

В. А. Шелухін (2017). Internet piracy as a rational choice: evidence from the Becker model and J. S. Coleman’s conception of micro-to-macro transitions. Вісник Національного технічного університету України “Київський політехнічний інститут”. Політологія. Соціологія. Право., 1(), 161-170. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-445511