Is Peer Assessment Reliable in Objectively Structured Clinical Examination?

Journal Title: Bagcilar Medical Bulletin - Year 2021, Vol 6, Issue 1

Abstract

Objective: The study was designed to evaluate the reliability of the peer assessment in the objectively structured clinical examination (OSCE) for the summative assessment of 4th grade students at the end of general surgery clerkship. Method: The study was planned prospectively with the permission of the Dean of Medicine Faculty and approval of the ethics committee. The 6th grade students who were in the surgery rotation participated in the study as peer assessors (PA). Both peers and department of general surgery assessed the students. Pass/fail point was accepted as 60. The scores of OSCE and performance evaluation given by peers and faculty were compared statistically. Results: Twenty-three students completed general surgery clerkship. Ten students (43.5%) were female. According to performance scores given by the faculty, 15 (65.2%) of the 23 students were successful, while all students were considered successful (having a grade of 60 or more) based on the scores of peer evaluation. There was a significant difference between the faculty members and PA with regard to the performance evaluation (p=0.008). The faculty members found five students (27.8%) successful in the OSCE (having a grade of 60 or more). However, ten students (43.5%) received a score of at least six from peer evaluation. Although there was a difference, it was not significant (p=0.063). Gender did not affect scoring in performance evaluation and OSCE application. Conclusion: Although there was a difference between faculty members and peer evaluators in the performance evaluation, no difference was observed in OSCE. In conclusion, OSCE assessment by peer evaluators is reliable.

Authors and Affiliations

Hasan Dagmura, Emin Daldal, Hüseyin Bakır, Mehmet Fatih Daşıran, Zeki Özsoy, Osman Demir, İsmail Okan, Ertan Bülbüloğlu

Keywords

Related Articles

In Vivo Analgesic Potential in Swiss Albino Mice and in Vitro Thrombolytic and Membrane Stabilizing Activities of Methanolic Extract From Suaeda Maritima Whole Plant

Objective: Cold methanolic extract of Suaeda maritima have been considered to screen their biological properties such as analgesic, membrane stabilizing and thrombolytic activity. Although some investigations have previo...

Anesthesia Experience in a Patient with Myotonia Congenita

Myotonia congenita (MC) was first described as a skeletal muscle disorder by Thomsen in 1876. As a result of the mutation of the chloride channel gene (CLCN1), which is on the 17th chromosome, patients suffer from muscle...

Anesthetic Experience in a Patient with Stiff-Person Syndrome - Case Report

Stiff-person syndrome is a rare disorder characterized by muscle rigidity and episodic spasms. In this report, we present a case of stiff-person syndrome that underwent successful general anesthesia. According to our exp...

Determination of Prognostic Factors in Cerebral Contusions

Objective: Cerebral contusion (CC) is vital because it is one of the most common traumatic brain injury (TBI) types and can lead to lifelong physical, cognitive, and psychological disorders. As with all other types of cr...

Hodgkin’s Lymphoma as a Rare Cause of Vanishing Bile Duct Syndrome: A Case Report

Vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS) is a disorder presented with jaundice and prolonged cholestasis due to intrahepatic cholestasis with the paucity of interlobular bile ducts. Liver involvement of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP693316
  • DOI 10.4274/BMB.galenos.2020.09.054
  • Views 112
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hasan Dagmura, Emin Daldal, Hüseyin Bakır, Mehmet Fatih Daşıran, Zeki Özsoy, Osman Demir, İsmail Okan, Ertan Bülbüloğlu (2021). Is Peer Assessment Reliable in Objectively Structured Clinical Examination?. Bagcilar Medical Bulletin, 6(1), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-693316