Is Peer Assessment Reliable in Objectively Structured Clinical Examination?

Journal Title: Bagcilar Medical Bulletin - Year 2021, Vol 6, Issue 1

Abstract

Objective: The study was designed to evaluate the reliability of the peer assessment in the objectively structured clinical examination (OSCE) for the summative assessment of 4th grade students at the end of general surgery clerkship. Method: The study was planned prospectively with the permission of the Dean of Medicine Faculty and approval of the ethics committee. The 6th grade students who were in the surgery rotation participated in the study as peer assessors (PA). Both peers and department of general surgery assessed the students. Pass/fail point was accepted as 60. The scores of OSCE and performance evaluation given by peers and faculty were compared statistically. Results: Twenty-three students completed general surgery clerkship. Ten students (43.5%) were female. According to performance scores given by the faculty, 15 (65.2%) of the 23 students were successful, while all students were considered successful (having a grade of 60 or more) based on the scores of peer evaluation. There was a significant difference between the faculty members and PA with regard to the performance evaluation (p=0.008). The faculty members found five students (27.8%) successful in the OSCE (having a grade of 60 or more). However, ten students (43.5%) received a score of at least six from peer evaluation. Although there was a difference, it was not significant (p=0.063). Gender did not affect scoring in performance evaluation and OSCE application. Conclusion: Although there was a difference between faculty members and peer evaluators in the performance evaluation, no difference was observed in OSCE. In conclusion, OSCE assessment by peer evaluators is reliable.

Authors and Affiliations

Hasan Dagmura, Emin Daldal, Hüseyin Bakır, Mehmet Fatih Daşıran, Zeki Özsoy, Osman Demir, İsmail Okan, Ertan Bülbüloğlu

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative Evaluation of the First-grade and Senior Medical School Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Thoracic Surgery

Objective: Comparison of the knowledge and attitudes of first and last year medical students about thoracic surgery. Method: The answers of the five questionnaires which were directed to the first and last year medicine...

A Neglected Giant Cervical Intradural Extramedullary Tumor

Primary spinal tumors are rarely seen, and representing 4-8% of all central nervous system tumors. Extradural tumors constitute approximately 40% of intraspinal tumors whereas intradural-extramedullary tumors make up the...

Approach to The Occluded Permanent Hemodialysis Catheter

Objective: Central venous catheterization (CVC) is a type of surgery that hemodialysis (HD) patients frequently undergo. Presently, permanent CVCs (pCVCs) are the alternative to vascular access for patients requiring lon...

Mean Platelet Volume Values and Its Effects on Prognosis in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Objective: Stroke is a rapid onset of focal or global loss of cerebral function and is the most common cause of mortality and morbidity in adulthood cancer and heart disease patients. Although it has been reported that m...

The Step Wise Effect of Vessel Ligation Method on Intra and Postoperative Hypoparathyroidism in the Total Thyroidectomy

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the step-wise effects of vascular ligation method on the parathyroid function in intraoperative and early postoperative periods of total thyroidectomy. Method: A total o...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP693316
  • DOI 10.4274/BMB.galenos.2020.09.054
  • Views 106
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hasan Dagmura, Emin Daldal, Hüseyin Bakır, Mehmet Fatih Daşıran, Zeki Özsoy, Osman Demir, İsmail Okan, Ertan Bülbüloğlu (2021). Is Peer Assessment Reliable in Objectively Structured Clinical Examination?. Bagcilar Medical Bulletin, 6(1), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-693316