Jak pisał Bruno Schulz? Domysły na podstawie sześciu stron rękopisu jednego opowiadania

Journal Title: Schulz/Forum - Year 2014, Vol 4, Issue 4

Abstract

Schulz’s work has reached us in fragments. We do not know a large part of what he wrote and drew. But Schulz is also a “writer without an archive,” which is why he seems to be so mature and accomplished from the very outset of his career – with no “at first” and “then,” no beginning and end. In such a context, all his available manuscripts are particularly important. The present essay is an attempt to examine/describe Schulz’s writing (écriture) on the basis of the manuscript of “A Second Autumn.” Its six pages, compared with a version published in Kamena and the one included in Sanatorium under the Sign of an Hourglass, must stand for the whole lost archive. An analysis of the changes and corrections allows us to reveal the actual process of writing. Thanks to Schulz’s comments, we may place it in his biography: he has just gained success and knows that another book should follow, but in his letters he keeps complaining on a writer’s block. The only way out is to publish something already written, and fortunately there is something in store. Thus Schulz begins to work on the texts penned in the 1920s. He must only, as he puts it, “choose, finish, edit, and rewrite” them. The manuscript of “A Second Autumn” is a document of rewriting – in a way, the author is a parasite on his own work. Still, working on his old texts, Schulz believes that he is a traitor not only of himself, but also of the original inspiration. Once inspired, he must become a writer and becomes one, though he must change his method. A return to the innocence and disinterestedness of the 1920s is impossible. Under the pressure of external circumstances, Schulz begins a new epoch in his writing. The lost Messiah was probably intended as its center. Some of Schulz’s essays from that period reveal a poetics that is different from his original one. That other, different poetics may be called a poetics of “making the myth real,” of a “biological semantics.” The manuscript of “A Second Autumn” demonstrates the decline of the former way of writing.

Authors and Affiliations

Stanisław Rosiek

Keywords

Related Articles

Korekta

The fourth issue of “Schulz/Forum” is an opportunity to draw conclusions, but also to correct the originally chosen approach. Its dominant are Jewish motifs in Schulz’s life and fiction. Besides, it contains a new rubric...

„Zmierzch będzie zapadał”, albo Historia Bianki

Joseph saw Bianca for the first time when “she was wearing a white dress, slender and calligraphic as if the had been out of the Zodiac.” Then he had no way out – he could not stop dreaming about meeting her once more. H...

Wpływowy brat Izydor (Baruch, Izrael) Schulz

After a Roman Catholic baptism, Izydor Schulz became an important member of the municipal board of Drogobych, cooperating with the Mayor Rajmund Jarosz. At that time, still before World War I, he designed and constructed...

Zwycięski Schulz w koronie

Labirynty Brunona Schulza is an attempt to look at the writer’s output through the prism of occult knowledge, particularly the works of Aleister Crowley. Adam Wosiak searches in Schulz’s fiction for the images of a world...

Pisanie Ojca. „Gen schulzowski” w prozie Danila Kiša

Danilo Kiš claimed that his favorite works of other writers not only contributed to his own books as their “ancestors,” but also became parts of his spiritual DNA. The author makes an attempt at finding the “Schulzean ge...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP169809
  • DOI -
  • Views 54
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Stanisław Rosiek (2014). Jak pisał Bruno Schulz? Domysły na podstawie sześciu stron rękopisu jednego opowiadania. Schulz/Forum, 4(4), 53-74. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-169809