Limits of Naturalism – Limits of Legal Sciences

Journal Title: Polish Law Review - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

Contemporary developments in natural sciences have reinvigorated the debates over the need of naturalisation of social sciences and the humanities. It raises the further question of the extent to which these debates should pertain also to jurisprudence. The paper examines this problem and outlines the distinction between two approaches to the point and nature of jurisprudence. The first is oriented toward the exposition of the content of law. It is based mainly on methodologies being developed within legal dogmatics and is directly relevant to the practice of law, which draws heavily on the respective fields of legal scholarship. The other approach conceives the phenomenon of law as a part of social and psychological reality and seeks explanation of what how the exists, develops and what are the socio-psychological mechanisms of its functioning. Such inquiries are oriented towards cognitive purposes rather than provide direct support to legal practice. These two versions of scientific study on law are dubbed „legal sciences” and the „science of law” respectively. The core of the first is a hermeneutic act of understanding and therefore legal science is principally inapt for serious naturalisation. In contrast to that, the science of law is empirical and in order to have truly scientific character it has to be – at least in the long run - built into a web of coherent causal explanations of reality developed by mutually interacting natural science and naturalized behavioural and neurosciences.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Tomasz Pietrzykowski

Keywords

Related Articles

Selected aspects of legal protection of graphical user interfaces (GUIs) in the European Union – between works and designs

The graphical user interfaces have become one of the most important means in software marketing over the last decades. This phenomenon occurs with particular intensity in relation to simple, non-specialized software. The...

Ochrona kulturowej tożsamości projektów - powszechna potrzeba. Czy kulturowa własność intelektualna powinna być uznana konstytucyjnie?

Ochrona kulturowej tożsamości projektów w dzisiejszym społeczeństwie jest koniecznością i powinna być przedmiotem wspólnej, europejskiej polityki kulturalnej. Zawsze obecna nie tylko w branży mody, ale również we wszystk...

Graficzny obraz system prawa: prawo, estetyka, estetyka prawa?

Filozofia prawa dotyczy takich tradycyjnych kwestii filozoficznych jak ontologia, epistemologia, logika i etyka. Zwykle jednak nie uwzględnia ostatniego z głównych zagadnień filozoficznych – estetyki. Autor próbuje wypeł...

On the naturalisation of law

The goal of the paper is to formulate a new conception of the naturalisation of law. I begin by highlighting the conceptual problems connected to the notion of naturalisation. I then proceed to describe and criticise thr...

Istota konstytucyjnej wolności człowieka

Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z 2 kwietnia 1997 roku chroni wolność człowieka w sposób kompleksowy. Można powiedzieć, że wszechstronna ochrona wolności człowieka, tj. wolności realizującej się w sferze osobistej...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP251310
  • DOI -
  • Views 121
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Tomasz Pietrzykowski (2017). Limits of Naturalism – Limits of Legal Sciences. Polish Law Review, 3(1), 35-50. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-251310