Logicznie poprawny argument tu quoque
Journal Title: Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny HYBRIS - Year 2019, Vol 1, Issue 44
Abstract
The argument tu quoque is widely called a logical fallacy. The aim of this study is to show, that this theorem is ill-considered. The text is focused on the analysis of various examples of tu quoque. This analysis leads to the conclusion that there are logically correct tu quoque. There are given some examples of such tu quoque. Main theorem of the article is that tu quoque is correct if it’s used as some kind of mental shortcut referring to other arguments.
Authors and Affiliations
Piotr Sękowski
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP568121
- DOI -
- Views 63
- Downloads 0
Śmierć i (wieczny) powrót Zaratustry
The paper argues that F. Nietzsche’s magnum opus Thus Spoke Zarathustra can be looked upon as a narrative about the protagonist’s maturation to understand, articulate and accept the thought of the eternal return which is...
Na początku był kryzys
Od redakcji
Niezrównoważenie w kryzysie
W czasach kryzysu Europy nadmierne koncentrowanie się na kwestiach rynkowych i gospodarczych w analizowaniu przyczyn i szukaniu rozwiązan wspo łczesnych problemo w wydaje mi się działaniem niedostatecznym. Co więcej, uwa...
O kategorii созерцания w "Niepojętym" Siemiona Franka i jej niektórych filozoficznych korzeniach
One of the most puzzling categories in The Unknowable by Semyon Frank is созерцание - a word close to German Anschauung and sometimes used as its translation. The aim of this article is to analyze the meaning of the cate...
МАРКСИСТСКАЯ ТЕОРИЯ ПРАВА И ПОСТСОВЕТСКАЯ РОССИЙСКАЯ ФИЛОСОФИЯ (ТЕОРИЯ) ПРАВА
Russian legal theorists condemn Marxist law theory, without being truly familiar with it. The theory is criticized for dogmatism, for not being applicable to modern political and legal processes and phenomena and for pro...