Mackie vs Plantinga on the warrant of theistic belief without arguments

Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to critically assess two opposing theses about the epistemology of religious belief. The first one, developed by John Mackie, claims that belief in God can be justified or warranted only if there is a good argument for the existence of God. The second thesis, elaborated by Alvin Plantinga, holds that even if there is no such argument, belief in God can be justified or warranted. I contend that the first thesis is plausibly false, because belief in God is not just like a scientific hypothesis, and the second thesis is likely true if epistemic externalism is the correct view. However, even if the second thesis is true, I argue that to work on good arguments for God’s existence is unavoidable in order to cope with a new version of the Great Pumpkin objection, as well as to achieve other relevant purposes such as to convince rational observers outside the theistic community that belief in God is likely justified or warranted.

Authors and Affiliations

Domingos Faria

Keywords

Related Articles

Certeza razonable en ciencia y filosofía

Reasonable certainty in science and philosophy It is argued that, as forms of knowledge, neither science is so safe nor philosophy is as arbitrary as often claimed. Mathematics and experimental science are founded on po...

Conciliar Christology and the Problem of Incompatible Predications

In this article I canvas the options available to a proponent of the traditional doctrine of the incarnation against a charge of incoherence. In particular, I consider the charge of incoherence due to incompatible predic...

Ethical Reflections on Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology presents a multitude of ethical concerns, many of which are being actively considered by organizations ranging from small groups in civil society to large corporations and governme...

Existence et temporalité chez Suárez. De l’ontologie au politique

Existence and temporality according to Suarez. From ontology to politics In Suarez’s metaphysics, there is an equivalence regarding to ens ab alio between duration and permanence in being. Interrogation about the relati...

Homo technologicus and the Recovery of a Universal Ethic: Maximus the Confessor and Romano Guardini

On September 1st2017, Pope Francis and the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew issued a Joint Message for the World Day of Prayer for Creation. The gesture reveals the church’s efforts “to breathe with two lungs” on the urg...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP195145
  • DOI 10.12775/SetF.2016.006
  • Views 78
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Domingos Faria (2016). Mackie vs Plantinga on the warrant of theistic belief without arguments. Scientia et Fides, 4(1), 77-100. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-195145