Manuscript “Neoplatonic Philosophy” by Pamfil D. Yurkevych: source criticism

Abstract

This article is the first to bring into scientific discussion and to provide a historico-philosophical analysis of a manuscript “Neoplatonic Philosophy from the archive of Pamfil Danylovych Yurkevych (1826–1874). The reviewed manuscript belongs to P. D. Yurkevych’s handwritten nachlass stored in the funds of the Institute of Manuscript of V. I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine in the city of Kyiv. Additional archival materials (in particular, programs of P. D. Yurkevych’s lectures that took place in 1850s – beginning of 1860s in Kyiv Theological Academy) are involved to answer several research questions. The author of this article provides arguments in favor of proving that the manuscript is to be attributed to P. D. Yurkevych’s own handwriting, to be dated circa 1856, and that the purposing of its content is to be qualified as didactic. As it is established in the article, textual content of the manuscript in question is an original concise description and analysis of neoplatonic philosophy, which belongs to the set of materials created by P. D. Yurkevych in preparation for teaching the course on Ancient Philosophy in Kyiv Theological Academy during Kyivan period of his work. Turning to the inner critique of the manuscript, author of this article emphasizes an analysis that P. D. Yurkevych conducts concerning Plotinus’s ideas of the process of emanation of the world from the One and the role that philosophy has in true cognition. While comparing the manuscript “Neoplatonic Philosophy” with one of P. D. Yurkevych’s substantial philosophical works “Idea” (1859), additional light is shed upon the prosess of genesis and development of Christian-Platonic worldview of the thinker. Furthermore, it is established that the manuscript in question played a major role in P. D. Yurkevych’s own schooling, particulary concerning his view on the philosophy of Plotinus, and his general reception of the Platonic tradition.

Authors and Affiliations

A. Pylypiuk

Keywords

Related Articles

Рукопис Памфіла Юркевича «Философия неоплатоническая»: джерелознавчий аналіз

У статті вперше в історико-філософській літературі здійснено аналіз рукопису «Философия неоплатоническая» з архіву Памфіла Даниловича Юркевича (1826–1874), що зберігається в Інституті рукопису Національної бібліотеки Укр...

Дослідження католицизму на сторінках журналу «Труды Киевской духовной академии» (1860-ті – початок 1900-х рр.)

У статті вперше здійснено цілісний та систематичний аналіз студій вихованців і викладачів Київської духовної академії, присвячених засадам віровчення, історії та тогочасному стану католицизму, що були надруковані в журна...

Утопія і нігілізм: філософські уроки Лєшека Колаковського

У статті проаналізовано основні аспекти тлумачення філософського мислення польським філософом Лєшеком Колаковським (1927–2009) тією мірою, якою вони пов’язані з питанням автономності мислення. Метою є реконструкція принц...

Philosophical and anthropological studies in NaUKMA: the problem of human as a moral and ethical being

Last year, the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies of “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy” celebrated the 25 th anniversary. This article confines to this very special event and analyzes three important anthropological studi...

Other and Stranger in the structure of the human self (Buber, Levinas, Kristeva)

In this article, the author examines the relationship between the human self and its two distinctive conditions – the Other, as any alternative form of being, and the Stranger, as hostility. In the first part of the art...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP496345
  • DOI 10.18523/2617-16782153213
  • Views 49
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

A. Pylypiuk (2018). Manuscript “Neoplatonic Philosophy” by Pamfil D. Yurkevych: source criticism. Наукові записки НаУКМА. Філософія та релігієзнавство, 0(), 26-34. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-496345