Measuring Social Value Orientation

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 8

Abstract

Narrow self-interest is often used as a simplifying assumption when studying people making decisions in social contexts. Nonetheless, people exhibit a wide range of different motivations when choosing unilaterally among interdependent outcomes. Measuring the magnitude of the concern people have for others, sometimes called Social Value Orientation (SVO), has been an interest of many social scientists for decades and several different measurement methods have been developed so far. Here we introduce a new measure of SVO that has several advantages over existent methods. A detailed description of the new measurement method is presented, along with norming data that provide evidence of its solid psychometric properties. We conclude with a brief discussion of the research streams that would benefit from a more sensitive and higher resolution measure of SVO, and extend an invitation to others to use this new measure which is freely available.

Authors and Affiliations

Ryan O. Murphy, Kurt A. Ackerman and Michel J. J. Handgraaf

Keywords

Related Articles

The Drift Diffusion Model can account for the accuracy and reaction time of value-based choices under high and low time pressure

An important open problem is how values are compared to make simple choices. A natural hypothesis is that the brain carries out the computations associated with the value comparisons in a manner consistent with the Drift...

A reason-based explanation for moral dumbfounding

The moral dumbfounding phenomenon for harmless taboo violations is often cited as a critical piece of empirical evidence motivating anti-rationalist models of moral judgment and decision-making. Moral dumbfounding purpor...

Subjective but not objective numeracy influences willingness to pay for BRCA1/2 genetic testing

A positive test result for BRCA1/2 gene mutation is a substantial risk factor for breast and ovarian cancer. However, testing is not always covered by insurance, even for high risk women. Variables affecting willingness...

Are within-subjects designs transparent?

Researchers frequently argue that within-subjects designs should be avoided because they result in research hypotheses that are transparent to the subjects in the study. This conjecture was empirically tested by replicat...

Leftmost-digit-bias in an enumerated public sector? An experiment on citizens’ judgment of performance information

Numerical performance information is increasingly important to political decision-making in the public sector. Some have suggested that biases in citizens’ processing of numerical information can be exploited by politici...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677861
  • DOI -
  • Views 187
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ryan O. Murphy, Kurt A. Ackerman and Michel J. J. Handgraaf (2011). Measuring Social Value Orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-677861