Metacognitive judgment and denial of deficit: Evidence from frontotemporal dementia

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 6

Abstract

Patients suffering from the behavioral variant of Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD-b) often exaggerate their abilities. Are those errors in judgment limited to domains in which patients under-perform, or do FTD-b patients overestimate their abilities in other domains? Is overconfidence in FTD-b patients domain-specific or domain-general? To address this question, we asked patients at early stages of FTD-b to judge their performance in two domains (attention, perception) in which they exhibit relatively spared abilities. In both domains, FTD-b patients overestimated their performance relative to patients with Dementia of Alzheimer Type (DAT) and healthy elderly subjects. Results are consistent with a domain-general deficit in metacognitive judgment. We discuss these findings in relation to “regression to the mean” accounts of overconfidence and the role of emotions in metacognitive judgments.

Authors and Affiliations

Diego Fernandez-Duque and Sandra E. Black

Keywords

Related Articles

The limited value of precise tests of the recognition heuristic

The recognition heuristic models the adaptive use and dominant role of recognition knowledge in judgment under uncertainty. Of the several predictions that the heuristic makes, empirical tests have predominantly focused...

A paycheck half-empty or half-full? Framing, fairness and progressive taxation

Taxation policy is driven by many factors, including public opinion, but little research has examined the strength and stability of the public’s taxation preferences. This paper demonstrates one way in which preferences...

Less cognitive conflict does not imply choice of the default option: Commentary on Kieslich and Hilbig (2014)

Kieslich and Hilbig (2014) employ a mouse-tracking technique to measure decision conflict in social dilemmas. They report that defectors exhibit more conflict than do cooperators. They infer that cooperation thus is the...

Memory retrieval processes help explain the incumbency advantage

Voters prefer political candidates who are currently in office (incumbents) over new candidates (challengers). Using the premise of query theory (Johnson, Häubl & Keinan, 2007), we clarify the underlying cognitive mechan...

Good luck, bad luck, and ambiguity aversion

We report a series of experiments investigating the influence of feeling lucky or unlucky on people’s choice of known-risk or ambiguous options using the traditional Ellsberg Urns decision-making task. We induced a state...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677594
  • DOI -
  • Views 154
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Diego Fernandez-Duque and Sandra E. Black (2007). Metacognitive judgment and denial of deficit: Evidence from frontotemporal dementia. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(6), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-677594