MOST COMMON SIX ERRORS ON LEGAL INTERPRETATION IN ECUADOR
Journal Title: Ius Humani. Revista de Derecho - Year 2008, Vol 1, Issue 1
Abstract
The main purpose of this work is to correct the misconception prevailing in culture of the Ecuadorian legal interpretation of the law. For this, the author through constructive criticism, show six misconceptions quite accepted by our lawyers, judges and public officials. Also develops an introductory study on the purpose of the interpretation of the law and its associated elements.
Authors and Affiliations
César Coronel Jones
Critical Introduction To Natural Law
This review provides a comparison between the different editions of the famous work of Hervada, discussed here. The outcome of this analysis arise five new hermeneutical rules that analyze how to interpret positive law o...
JUSTICIABILITY OF SOCIAL RIGHTS: BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO AN INTEGRATED SYSTEM OF MULTILEVEL PROTECTION
Since 2000, social rights have gained prominence in our countries (Andean countries), inside the Doctrine, and in the worldwide and regional organizations, for the protection of human rights. These have been raised as ap...
THE ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW OF THE CITIZENSHIP CRITERION AND ITS DISTINCTION FROM OTHER SIMILAR CONCEPTS IN IRANIAN LAW
Citizenship is one of the concepts discussed in most fields of humanities. Each field has studied it within a context regarding its perspective. The criterion of citizenship has been neglected in most of these studies an...
RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION ON XXI CENTURY
All kind of persecutions are deplorable acts, especially those targeting religious groups, because it limits the freedom of the human being in his relationship with God. Unfortunately, the universal history shows us that...
FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND DEMOCRATIC CONSTRAINT
There is a significant literature justifying why freedom of speech should be seen as a fundamental right. At the individual level, freedom of speech should be protected to further autonomy. In the public domain, freedom...