New ideas about the structure and functions of national ecological network in the context of modern postnonclassical concepts

Abstract

Today the idea of sustainable development has revealed severe signs of disability as evidenced by the fact that the global environmental problem is steadily worsening. All this makes to question the methodological guidelines which are incorporated into the content of the concept of national ecological networks. One of the main methodological mistakes implied in the development of the concept of ecological networks is bright biocentrism which led to their designing in some virtual space, completely detached from the real spatial organization of society. In fact, building a national ecological network as a spatial phenomenon may not be feasible without “inscribing” it in the specific area subject to certain models of socio-natural interaction. The nearest natural and anthropogenic landscape components approach the state of harmony not barrier but contact borders (in the form of strips, ecotones). Thus the best “contact” between a man and nature should promote exactly informative and ideological functions performed by technogenesis objects. Such theoretical approach provides a new tool for the formalization of relations between nature and society in the organization of the environmental work including formation of the ecological network. So trips to anthropogenically disturbed landscapes under the new concept of ecotourism should consider all possible demands of tourists and visual observation of different forms and results of anthropogenic impact on nature. Involvement of technogenesis facilities to eco-tourism and local history work in regions of old industrial development has another socio-geographical aspect. Technogenic tourism which may be a separate branch of ecotourism is largely designed to overcome deep contradictions in complex civilizational fault line of the Ukrainian history. In particular, regions such as Kryvbas can provide tourist product mainly involving objects of industrial origin and content. The use of postnonclassical approaches to formation of the national ecological network reveals new features that should carry out modern alternative tourism destinations.

Authors and Affiliations

Tetiana Kazakova

Keywords

Related Articles

Industrial tourism in Sumy region: resources and perspectives

The essence of industrial tourism as well as the volume of terms “production tourism” and “industrial tourism” are consid-ered. The regional features of the clustering process of the tourism services market are studies a...

Administrative-territorial reform: results of integration of the consolidated territorial communities (CTC) in the Khmelnytsky region

The article reviews the changes in administrative-territorial division of the Khmelnytsky region that occurred due to the re-form of the territorial organization of power in Ukraine. The authors have given an assessment...

Методичні особливості викладання навчальної дисципліни «Основи технологій виробництва»

У статті розглянуто методичні особливості викладання навчальної дисципліни «Основи технологій виробництва» на прикладі навчання студентів за напрямом підготовки 6.040104 Географія* та спеціальності 014 Середня освіта (Ге...

Modern Ukrainian diaspora in countries of former USSR

In countries of the former Soviet Union concentrated almost half of the modern Ukrainian diaspora, particularly in the Russian Federation is home to the most numerous Ukrainian diaspora in the world. A reason of appearan...

Geographical vision of the prof. O. Vashchenko: projecting on contemporary

The contribution of the well-known Ukrainian economist-geographer, cartographer, organizer and long-time leader of the Department of Economic Geography of the Ivan Franko National University of Lviv O. Vashchenko on the...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP181152
  • DOI -
  • Views 89
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Tetiana Kazakova (2016). New ideas about the structure and functions of national ecological network in the context of modern postnonclassical concepts. Часопис соціально-економічної географії, 20(1), 96-99. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-181152