Non-surgical management of perforated peptic ulcer: An alternative method of definitive treatment

Journal Title: IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) - Year 2017, Vol 16, Issue 11

Abstract

Introduction: Peptic perforation is a common surgical emergency presenting as acute abdomen. Perforation which is potentially the most serious complication for the ulcer patient is fortunately rare. It is probably not seen in more than 2% of the patients suffering from peptic ulceration. The accepted therapeutic options in perforated peptic ulcer are simple closure or immediate definitive operation. Conservative/ non- surgical treatment, originally proposed by Wangensteen, was recommended as the treatment of choice in perforated peptic ulcer by Taylor in 1956. Materials and methods: The present study was a retrospective cum prospective study conducted by reviewing the records of patients admitted with signs and symptoms diagnosis of dry peptic perforation In the retrospective study records of 50 patients with dry perforation In the prospective study 25 patients the study groups who presented as peptic perforation to be sealed and/ or haemodynamically stable patients with peptic perforation and/or with other serious illness when the risk of surgery is prohibitive. Aims and objectives: To access the efficacy and reliability of conservative /non-operative treatment of perforated peptic ulcer and also to observe the complication leading to morbidity and mortality. It also aimed to access and evaluate the criteria used for conservative management of peptic perforation. Results: Non-surgical management was taken as the treatment of choice for all 75 cases. 60 out of total (80%) were cured by non-surgical treatment. Operative intervention was done in 6 cases (8%) and was regarded as failure of conservative treatment, complication developed in 4 patients (5.33%) and mortality was 9.33%.

Authors and Affiliations

Jitendra Kumar Mangtani, Ankita Jain

Keywords

Related Articles

A Clinical Study of Abdominal Wound Dehiscence and Its Management”

Wound dehiscence is one among the most dreaded complications faced by the surgeons. By definition, dehiscence is the separation of fascial layers early in the postoperative course.Wound dehiscence is described as partial...

Tobacco Smoking, Is It Really Harmful? A Structured Review and Recent Advances

Objective: To compare the beneficial and harmful effects of tobacco use and cigarette smoking on oral health. The methodology used: A structured review of the articles which are analyzed and which were concerned about th...

Use of Antenatal Corticosteroids prior to Elective Caesarean Section at Term in Reducing the Incidence of Transient Tachypnoea of the Newborn – A ThreeYear Observational Studyin A Premium Institute.

Background: Neonates delivered by elective Caesarean section are found to be associated with an increased risk of respiratory morbidity when compared to their vaginal counterparts; and the risk of respiratory complicatio...

Clinical Profile and Outcome of Envenomous Snake-Bite At Tertiary Care Centre In Nellore- A Retrospective Study

Aims: To study the prevalence of poisonous and non-poisonous snake bites in nellore district with reference to age, sex, occupation, part of body bitten, time of bite and seasonal variation, and the types of poisonous sn...

A review of the diagnosis and management of impacted maxillary canines

Impacted teeth are those which are not predictable and do not erupt absolutely based on clinical and radiographic assessment. Certain impactions can be complicated and the outcome unpredictable if the tooth is positioned...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP238233
  • DOI 10.9790/0853-1611025760
  • Views 138
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jitendra Kumar Mangtani, Ankita Jain (2017). Non-surgical management of perforated peptic ulcer: An alternative method of definitive treatment. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS), 16(11), 57-60. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-238233