Ontology of good and evil in the context of philosophy m.buber: search of a dialogue between god and human
Journal Title: Мultiversum. Philosophical almanac - Year 2018, Vol 0, Issue 3
Abstract
The article is devoted to revealing the essence of good and evil in the situation of dialogue between God and man according to M.Buber's philosophical worldview. It is noted that the measurement of the world from the position of dualism has found its way in the philosophy of M.Buber through the correlation of communication in the prism of the subject-object contradiction «I – You», «I – It», where I – is an attempt to stick out a man himself a permanent subject over the objects, and the violation of dialogue with God leads to thinking about God from theodicea to atheism. This article uses primary source research directly the works of the philosopher, as well as achievements of other researchers, such as T.Lyncea, A.Outn, A.Ogurtsov, I.Bergolak. The main directions of the article are: analysis of the dialogue structure of the world according to the philosophy of M.Buber; definition of the role of Faith in the system of dialogue between God and man; development of the ontology model of good and evil in the philosophy of M.Buber. In the philosophy of M.Buber distinguishes three types of dialogue, which are passed through the concept of» should «and the concept of» is», that is, a person conducts a dialogue from the position of his own self-acceptance, respectively, as he believes it is worth entering into a dialogue with what is understood as what is relevant to the dialogue. Dialogue with God, man leads from a position of determining who God is in this dialogue, and consequently makes certain claims regarding the rules of communication. In such a dialogue, faith is lost as trust and faith as faith of unsubstantiated. The article States that the ontological model of the world from a position of Christian theodicy is not a dialogue, built by combining two faiths. M.Buber compares two models of communication with God – early Christians and Jews and determines that it was not necessary for early Jews to justify God regarding the creation of evil. This means that God is the Creator and the original source of both good and evil, but only through man evil is separated from good, and acquires its own essence.
Authors and Affiliations
Hanna Savonova
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP661374
- DOI -
- Views 195
- Downloads 0
Общественный идеал: некоторые особенности анти- чного понимания
В статье анализируются точки зрения представителей античной философской культуры на сущность социального идеала и возможность его практического достижения. Обосновывается мысль о то, что представления о необходимости фор...
Urban spase ecology in a context of behavioural patterns of citizens
The article raises the problem of the urban environment ecology as the ecology of social environment, where the citizen produces certain types of behavioral patterns. Urban behavioral patterns are considered in the socia...
Dynamics of value orientations of Ukrainian youth
The article is devoted to the analysis of the dynamics value orientations of Ukrainian youth, highlighting the issue of youth social activity and the impact of this phenomenon on public life. According to the results of...
Космологические идеи в суфизме: современные интерпретации
Исследуются основные положения суфийской космологии в их связи с антропологическими идеями. Особое внимание уделяется отражению и интерпретации этих концепций в дидактических текстах и современной суфийской традиции. Инт...
Инверсия процессов, последствий и осознание революции
В начале XXI ст. темпы социального развития стали настолько стремительными и драматическими, что острые и неотложные вопросы, поставленные его изломами и изменениями, требуют не только научно обоснованных теоретических о...