Patients’ perceptions toward and the driving factors of decision-making for opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cesarean section

Journal Title: Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Year 2020, Vol 17, Issue 2

Abstract

Objective: Enough data can be found in the literature regarding the protective effect of tubal ligation on gynecological cancers. In addition, a large body of evidence revealed that prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy had no significant negative effect on the ovarian function, quality of life, sexuality, surgery duration, and cost-effectivity. This study was aimed at exploring the underlying factors that motivate women for either opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (OBS) or tubal ligation, particularly focusing on their preferences, knowledge, and beliefs toward female sterilization, satisfaction from counseling, and body image following the salpingectomy. Materials and Methods: A total of 54 patients who had undergone surgical sterilization with either OBS or tubal ligation were included in this prospective cohort study. The acceptance rate of the OBS at the time of cesarean section among pregnant women seeking surgical sterilization was calculated. The underlying reasons for women’s acceptance or refusal for salpingectomy were assessed by a non-validated data collection tool that had 14 open-ended questions focusing on the women’s preferences, knowledge, beliefs toward female sterilization, satisfaction from counseling, and body image following the salpingectomy. Results: The acceptance rate of OBS at the time of cesarean section among pregnant women and electively among non-pregnant women were 93.5% (n=43/46) and 75% (6/8), respectively. The main driving factors influencing the decision of preferring OBS over tubal ligation were the risk-reducing effect for ovarian cancer and superior pregnancy prevention. Conclusion: The acceptance rate of OBS at the time of cesarean section was found to be very high, and it should therefore be offered at the time of cesarean section to women who desire permanent contraception.

Authors and Affiliations

Murat Yassa, Çiğdem Pulatoğlu

Keywords

Related Articles

A spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy presenting with acute abdomen treated with natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery procedure: Case report

Heterotopic pregnancy occurs 1 in 30000 pregnancies. We present case of an acute abdomen caused by a ruptured ectopic component. Our patient had no known risk factors, which made the diagnosis even more challenging. Intr...

The effects of menopausal uterine fibroids on the prognosis of endometrium cancer

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate any potential associations between uterine leiomyomas and endometrial cancer. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study of 153 female patients who have been operated be...

Energy drinks may affect the ovarian reserve and serum anti-mullerian hormone levels in a rat model

Objective: Energy drinks have an impact on concentration levels, physical performance, speed of reaction, and focus, but these drinks cause many adverse effects and intoxication symptoms. The main goal of this study was...

An overview of female genital mutilation

Female genital mutilation (FGM) includes procedures that intentionally alter or cause injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons. To present a case of type III FGM corrected by de-infibulation for treatm...

Prenatal diagnosis of persistent cloaca accompanied by uterus didelphys: A case report

Persistent cloaca is a rare abnormality that occurs usually in females and is characterized by direct communication between the gastrointestinal, urinary, and genital structures resulting in a single perineal opening. We...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP685115
  • DOI 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2020.12129
  • Views 160
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Murat Yassa, Çiğdem Pulatoğlu (2020). Patients’ perceptions toward and the driving factors of decision-making for opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cesarean section. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 17(2), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-685115