Podział władzy w Konstytucji RP z 1997 roku. Analiza formalna

Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2017, Vol 143, Issue 6

Abstract

The author fi rst builds the theoretical framework of the principle of division of powers, which consists of the following standards: A. Division between the legal spheres of state activity. B. Separation of the state apparatus into the corresponding organ groups (minimum two) according to the division of spheres, C. Relations between these organs are based on the principle of independence and equality. D. Individual groups of organs mutually check each other, and the use of these checks will result in both a relative balance and cooperation between them. E. Each group of organs is mostly engaged in its own legal sphere of activity and has a relatively limited ability to intervene in the activities of other groups. Then, the author compares these canons to the relevant provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 1997. As a result, he concludes that it is not possible to strictly separate the legislative and executive sphere of activity of the state and the complete exclusiveness of operation of an organ in its sphere. Moreover, it is not possible to perfectly balance the mutual infl uence of individual organs. The above listed canons of the division of powers thus function in the parliamentary system mainly as an ideal theoretical construction. Nevertheless, at least the essential part of them is provided.

Authors and Affiliations

Ryszard M. Małajny

Keywords

Related Articles

Współpraca międzyparlamentarna Rady Nordyckiej z perspektywy konstruktywizmu

The Nordic Council is the official body for formal inter-parliamentary co-operation among the Nordic countries, i.e., Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, the Faroe Islands, Greenland and Åland. It is deeply rooted...

Specyfika tzw. podstawowych zasad uznanych przez ustawy w porządku prawnym V Republiki Francuskiej

In the Fifth French Republic, legal norms of a constitutional rank are rooted not only in the text of the Constitution, but also in the acts referred to by its preamble. In it and there is, among others, a reference to t...

O mniej znanych kontrowersjach prawnych związanych z przyjęciem Konstytucji kwietniowej z 1935 r.

The author discusses the problems associated with legal irregularities accompanied by the adoption of the “April Constitution”. Paying particular attention to the fact that, in accordance with Art. 125 of its predecessor...

Konstytucja kwietniowa i konstytucje republikańskich państw autorytarnych w międzywojennej Europie. Próba porównania — wybrane zagadnienia (część I)

The article deals with the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 23 April 1935 as compared with constitutions of the authoritarian states of interwar Europe, which were republics. The scope of the a...

Instytucja materialnoprawna cofnięcie uprawnienia

The principle of sustainability of final administrative decisions is fundamental for administrative proceedings. An addressee of an administrative act may be deprived of his/her administrative legal right only when prere...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP257061
  • DOI -
  • Views 62
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ryszard M. Małajny (2017). Podział władzy w Konstytucji RP z 1997 roku. Analiza formalna. PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY, 143(6), 97-123. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-257061