Posterior Mandibular Tooth Socket Preservation with Amniotic Membrane and Allograft Bone versus Conventional Methods

Journal Title: Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 5

Abstract

Tooth socket preservation has become a key component of contemporary clinical dentistry. This term designates alveolar preservation that achieved by immediate filling of the undamaged tooth socket with biomaterials. Different types of bone substitutions and membranes have been utilized for socket augmentation. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of the amniotic membrane, as a new material, on bone density in comparison with conventional methods in this study. In this randomized clinical trial 75 patients (48 females and 27 males) underwent mandibular molar extraction and socket preservation by using allograft bone in control group: allograft bone with collagen membrane in group 1 and allograft bone with amniotic membrane in group 2. All 25 stages of socket preservation procedures in each group were done by the same surgeon and evaluated by the same radiographic machine. The data were statistically analyzed by SPSS software, one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests. P value <0.05 was considered as significant. The results of this study showed that after 4 months the mean density difference in extracted site was 1736.88 in control group; for patients who underwent socket preservation with allograft and collagen membrane it was 1746.20 and in cases with allograft in addition amniotic membrane it was 1762.48. The results demonstrated that, compared with control group, both collagen membrane and amniotic membrane showed a higher bone density mean (P Value =/998 and P Value = /918), but this difference was not statistically significant. Whereas amniotic membrane showed a higher bone density than the collagen membrane, there are no significant differences between these two groups (P Value =/994). Although socket preservation methods may be effective on alveolar bone contour stability, we cannot significantly confirm the efficacy of these methods on bone quality and density.

Authors and Affiliations

Rasoul Gheisari, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Sadaf Adibi

Keywords

Related Articles

Consistency of Digital Panoramic Results Compared to Digital Periapical in Evaluation of Bone Loss in Anterior and Posterior Mandible and Maxilla

This study evaluated the consistency of digital panoramic results compared to digital periapical in evaluation of bone loss in anterior and posterior mandible and maxilla. For this purpose, 10 patients with digital panor...

Histopathological Spectrum of Benign Breast Lesions

Breast lesions have gained global attention as breast cancer has become one of the leading causes of death among women. The importance of benign lesions lie in their ability to mimic cancers and not all benign lesions ar...

Significance of Effect of Metformin on Cancer Stem Cells – “Need of an Hour” in oral cancer

Oral cancer is a life-threatening disease. Advanced therapeutic approaches are still insufficient to improve the prognosis. Effect of Metformin on cancer stem cells (CSCs) provides promising future. Research on diverse m...

Correlation serum level of 25(OH)D and bone density in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

Bone density has positive relationship with levels of vitamin D, that reduce the risk of fracture. Some studies shows that vitamin D deficiency is not only related to skletal disease, but also to non-skletal disease such...

Assessment of Knowledge Regarding Rubella Infection amongst the Medical Students in a Government Medical College of Southern Rajasthan

Rubella (German measles) is a mild viral disease characterized by mild fever and rashes and is contagious by sneezing and coughing. Though it commonly affects the children but if it infects a pregnant woman, it leads to...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP326408
  • DOI -
  • Views 160
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Rasoul Gheisari, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Sadaf Adibi (2017). Posterior Mandibular Tooth Socket Preservation with Amniotic Membrane and Allograft Bone versus Conventional Methods. Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science, 5(5), 95-101. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-326408