Pourquoi revient-on toujours à Darwin?
Journal Title: Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy - Year 2011, Vol 3, Issue 1
Abstract
Mircea Flonta, Darwin şi după Darwin. Studii de filozofie a biologiei [Darwin et après Darwin. Études de philosophie de la biologie], Bucureşti: Humanitas, 2010
Authors and Affiliations
Ciprian Jeler
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP134877
- DOI -
- Views 98
- Downloads 0
Pratiques de la ville et inconscient urbain : déplacements de l’utopie dans le discours critique de l’urbanisme
This article tackles the critical approaches to urbanism as power-knowledge developed since the 1960-1970 based on the instruments of semiological and psychoanalytical analysis. From this viewpoint, we come back to the c...
Postmodernism Revisited: Current Trends and Interpretations
Stuart Sim, Fifty Key Postmodern Thinkers. London and New York: Routledge, 2013, 264 p.
La Mystagogie de Saint Maxime le Confesseur
Maximi Confessoris, Mystagogia: una cum Latina interpretatione Anastasii Bibliothecarii, edita a Christian Boudignon, Turnhout: Brepols, Corpus Christianorum. Series Graeca, nr. 69, 2011, 187 + 99 p.
The movement or the flesh: two conceptions of the ontological depth by Patočka and Merleau-Ponty
Both Patočka and Merleau-Ponty conceive the world not just as an Object, but rather as a field of an irreducible phenomenal and ontological depth. Patočka’s concept of movement and Merleau-Ponty’s concept of flesh are tw...
Naître du monde et naître au monde. Merleau-Ponty / Patočka
The phenomenon of birth is here to be presented as a crucial one, discreet though, into Merleau-Ponty and Patočka’s philosophy. So it deserves a confrontation of their respective thoughts. Both of them have radicalised H...