Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2014, Vol 9, Issue 1
Abstract
We investigated the relations between numeracy and superior judgment and decision making in two large community outreach studies in Holland (n=5408). In these very highly educated samples (e.g., 30–50% held graduate degrees), the Berlin Numeracy Test was a robust predictor of financial, medical, and metacognitive task performance (i.e., lotteries, intertemporal choice, denominator neglect, and confidence judgments), independent of education, gender, age, and another numeracy assessment. Metacognitive processes partially mediated the link between numeracy and superior performance. More numerate participants performed better because they deliberated more during decision making and more accurately evaluated their judgments (e.g., less overconfidence). Results suggest that well-designed numeracy tests tend to be robust predictors of superior judgment and decision making because they simultaneously assess (1) mathematical competency and (2) metacognitive and self-regulated learning skills.
Authors and Affiliations
Saima Ghazal, Edward T. Cokely and Rocio Garcia-Retamero
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678106
- DOI -
- Views 150
- Downloads 0
Is broad bracketing always better? How broad decision framing leads to more optimal preferences over repeated gambles
The effect of choice bracketing — the consideration of repeated decisions as a set versus in isolation — has important implications for products that are inherently time-sensitive and entail varying levels of risk, inclu...
The insurance effect: How the possession of gas masks reduces the likelihood of a missile attack
When a threat looms large in people’s minds, they may seek protective measures that could mitigate the negative outcomes associated with this threat. Paradoxically, the possession of such protective measures may, in turn...
Naturalness judgments by lay Americans: Process dominates content in judgments of food or water acceptability and naturalness
This study directly tests the hypothesis that, at least within the domains of food and drink for Americans, the judgment of naturalness has more to do with the history of an object, that is the processes that it has unde...
Cognitive reflection predicts the acceptance of unfair ultimatum game offers
In the ultimatum game, one player proposes a split of money between him- or herself and another player, who can accept the offer (and both players keep the allocated money) or reject the offer (and both players get nothi...
Willingness to test for BRCA1/2 in high risk women: Influenced by risk perception and family experience, rather than by objective or subjective numeracy?
Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer can help target prevention programs, and possibly reduce morbidity and mortality. A positive result of BRCA1/2 is a substantial risk factor for breast and ovarian cancer, and...