Predicting elections: Experts, polls, and fundamentals
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2018, Vol 13, Issue 4
Abstract
This study analyzes the relative accuracy of experts, polls, and the so-called ‘fundamentals’ in predicting the popular vote in the four U.S. presidential elections from 2004 to 2016. Although the majority (62%) of 452 expert forecasts correctly predicted the directional error of polls, the typical expert’s vote share forecast was 7% (of the error) less accurate than a simple polling average from the same day. The results further suggest that experts follow the polls and do not sufficiently harness information incorporated in the fundamentals. Combining expert forecasts and polls with a fundamentals-based reference class forecast reduced the error of experts and polls by 24% and 19%, respectively. The findings demonstrate the benefits of combining forecasts and the effectiveness of taking the outside view for debiasing expert judgment.
Authors and Affiliations
Andreas Graefe
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678365
- DOI -
- Views 155
- Downloads 0
Is that the answer you had in mind? The effect of perspective on unethical behavior
We explored how the perspective through which individuals view their actions influences their ethicality, comparing a narrow perspective that allows for evaluation of each choice in isolation, to a broad perspective that...
Applying the decision moving window to risky choice: Comparison of eye-tracking and mouse-tracing methods
Currently, a disparity exists between the process-level models decision researchers use to describe and predict decision behavior and the methods implemented and metrics collected to test these models. The current work s...
Variations on anchoring: Sequential anchoring revisited
The anchoring effect, the assimilation of judgment toward a previously considered value, has been shown using various experimental paradigms. We used several variations of the sequential anchoring paradigm, in which a nu...
Now you see it now you don't: The effectiveness of the recognition heuristic for selecting stocks.
It has been proposed that recognition can form the basis of simple but ecologically rational decision strategies (Gigerenzer & Goldstein, 1996). Borges, Goldstein, Ortmann, & Gigerenzer (1999) found that constructing sha...
Biases in choices about fairness: Psychology and economic inequality
This paper investigates choices about “distributional fairness” (sometimes called “distributive justice”), i.e., selection of the proper way for resources to be distributed in group. The study finds evidence that several...