Prevention of Propofol Injection Pain: A Comparison between Ondansetron, Dexamethasone and Lidocaine

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 6

Abstract

Introduction: Propofol (2,6 di-isopropyl phenol) is widely used agent for induction of anaesthesia, although the pain during its injection remains a concern for all anaesthesiologists. The incidence of Propofol injection pain (PIP) varies between 28% to 90% in adults. Despite several interventions and pretreatment with drugs to alleviate pain, the failure rate is 13-32%. The aim of this study was to find the most efficacious method of alleviating PIP by combining intervention of venous occlusion along with Lignocaine, Dexamethasone or Ondansetron pretreatment. Methods: This is a double blinded randomized prospective clinical study on adult patients between the age group of 18-59 years scheduled for elective general surgical procedures. 150 patients were randomly allocated through computer generated table into three groups scheduled to receive 2ml of Lignocaine (20mg), Ondansetron (4mg) or Dexamethasone (6mg). Drugs were administered after tourniquet application inflated to 40mm Hg and occlusion was released after 30 seconds and then 0.5mg/kg of propofol was administered at the rate of 0.5ml / sec. The blinded investigator evaluated the pain score using the four point scale at 15 second interval. Statistical analysis was made by SPSS version 16. Results: The incidence and intensity of pain in patients receiving Lidocaine and Dexamethasone were significantly lower than those receiving Ondansetron (p<0.001). Conclusion: Pretreatment with intravenous Dexamethasone and Lidocaine along with venous occlusion for 30 seconds was found to be equally effective in reducing Propofol injection pain. Both these drugs were found to be superior to Ondansetron in achieving this goal.

Authors and Affiliations

Arpana Kedlaya

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative Study between Intravenous Clonidine and Intravenous Fentanyl to Attenuate Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation

Background: Laryngoscopy and intubation are associated with acute hemodynamic responses. In susceptible patients even this short period (2-7 minutes) of hypertension and tachycardia can result in myocardial ischemia or i...

Evaluation of Spinal Anaesthesia in Paediatric Patient undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries

Purpose: Spinal anaesthesia is a useful technique for infraumbilical and lower limb surgeries. The misconceptions regarding its overall safety, feasibility and reliability can be better known with greater use, its appli...

Spinal Anaesthesia with Midline and Paramedian Technique in Pregnant Patients undergoing Lower Segment Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anaesthesia

Background and AIMS: Subarachnoid blockade is widely used due to its simplicity, low cost and reduced complications due to general anaesthesia. Subarachnoid space can be approached from midline or paramedian approach (PM...

Comparison of Two Different Doses of Oral Gabapentin for Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Study

Introduction: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation causes transient circulatory changes and are marked by tachycardia, hypertension and sometimes cardiac arrhythmias. Aims and Objective: This study was designed to co...

Rapid Sequence Intubation: Ease of Intubation and Haemodynamic Effects of Succinyl Choline Chloride Vs Rocuronium Bromide in Adult Patients

Objectives: To compare the intubating conditions, clinical duration of action, cardiovascular responses, side effects associated with administration of rocuronium bromide 0.9mg/kg and succinylcholine chloride 1mg/kg for...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP541201
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5618.4
  • Views 67
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Arpana Kedlaya (2018). Prevention of Propofol Injection Pain: A Comparison between Ondansetron, Dexamethasone and Lidocaine. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 5(6), 908-913. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-541201