ПРИНЦИПИ ГНУЧКОСТІ ПРОЦУСУАЛЬНОЇ ФОРМИВ ДИСПОЗИТИВНОМУ ПРОЦЕСІ: ЗАГАЛЬНОТЕОРЕТИЧНІ ПІДХОДИ
Journal Title: Науковий вісник публічного та приватного права - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 1
Abstract
It is substantiated that any legal process, especially one that starts at the initiative of an interested subject, can exist and develop only within the form fixed in the law, that is, within certain rules establishing the procedure and activities of all participants in the legal proceedings. It is proved that the civil procedural form is by its nature the maximum universality, based primarily on the fact that civil jurisdiction is of a general nature, while administrative and economic jurisdiction are special with respect to the first. The latest codification of procedural legislation is based on the beginnings of maximum unification of procedural forms and procedural procedures, with the exception of specifics of reviewing certain categories of cases (separate proceedings in civil proceedings, consideration of certain urgent cases in administrative proceedings, consideration of bankruptcy cases in economic cases, etc.). Therefore, if we consider the claim procedure for the consideration of court cases in discretionary processes, then the procedural form, built on the principle of universality, will be the general theoretical basis. It is concluded that the modern law is increasingly lagging behind the rapidly changing public relations, which in turn leads to the emergence of gaps in it, which is characteristic of the acts of Ukrainian procedural legislation set out in the new edition. It is determined that the flexibility of the procedural form is enshrined in the law of the possibility of subjects of the judicial process to influence the choice of optimal procedural actions due to the circumstances of a particular civil case and aimed at protecting the rights and legal interests of the participants in the judicial process. It is substantiated that it is the flexibility of the procedural form of the dispositive process (economic, civil, administrative) as one of its basic principles, combined with a reasonable application of judicial discretion, will allow to more effectively applying the existing rules of civil procedure, adapting them to the situation.
Authors and Affiliations
О. С. КОПИТОВА
СИСТЕМАТИЗАЦІЯ АДМІНІСТРАТИВНОГО ЗАКОНОДАВСТВА У СФЕРІ ОХОРОНИ ЗДОРОВ’Я В УКРАЇНІ: КЛАСИФІКАЦІЯ, ВИДИ
The article substantiates the need of classification division of systematization of healthcare legislation for a thorough study of its real resource. The attention is drawn to etymological meaning of its classification a...
СУБ’ЄКТИ АДМІНІСТРАТИВНО-ПРАВОВИХ ВІДНОСИНИ СФЕРІ ЕЛЕКТРОННО-ЦИФРОВОГО ПІДПИСУ
The article reveals the actual and legal status of the subjects of administrative-legal relations in the field of digital electronic signature. It is proved that the subjects of administrative-legal relations are charact...
ЮРИДИЧНА ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНІСТЬ ЯК ЕЛЕМЕНТ АДМІНІСТРАТИВНО-ПРАВОВОГО СТАТУСУ ПАТРУЛЬНОЇ ПОЛІЦІЇ УКРАЇНИ: ЗМІСТ ТА ОСОБЛИВОСТІ
In the article, the author, on the basis of doctrinal developments concerning the content and nature of legal responsibility and its separate types (criminal and administrative), as well as in-depth analysis of the relev...
АДМІНІСТРАТИВНА ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНІСТЬ ЮРИДИЧНИХ ОСІБ У СФЕРІ НЕЗАКОННОГО ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ПРИРОДНИХ РЕСУРСІВ
The article studies peculiarities of the institute of administrative responsibility in the field of illegal use of natural resources. Attention is drawn to the mandatory feature of the subjective responsibility of legal...
ПРИНЦИПИ РЕАЛІЗАЦІЇ ПРАВООХОРОНОЇ ФУНКЦІЇ ДЕРЖАВИ ОРГАНАМИ ПРОКУРАТУРИ УКРАЇНИ: ПОНЯТТЯ ТА ОЗНАКИ
In the article, based on the analysis of scientific developments in the sphere of reali- zation of the law enforcement function of the state and the study of the principles on the basis of which it is carried out, the si...