Private Enforcement and Opt-out System Risks, Rewards and Legal Safeguards
Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2018, Vol 11, Issue 18
Abstract
The EU Antitrust Damages Actions Directive does not include provisions for collective redress. Each EU member state is free to provide national regulation on this matter. The Portuguese legal system provided regulation on actio popularis since 1995. The ‘rational apathy’ of individual consumers may lead to non-reparation of damage and be of significant benefit for the company that is in breach of the law.The opt-out models solve the crucial economic problem caused by a large number of consumers or clients who have suffered a small loss because of competition law infringements. Under those circumstances, it is rational to be apathetic, because it can be foreseen that the cost of filing for compensatory damages will exceed the recovery obtained from the defendant. Such rational apathy of the parties injured by competition law infringements favours the wrongfully acting companies by not extracting their illegal gains from them. By not requiring the active consent of each of the claimants, the opt-out model is able to override rational apathy of consumers
Authors and Affiliations
Maria Elisabete Ramos
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP465675
- DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2018.11.18.4
- Views 223
- Downloads 0
Private Antitrust Enforcement Without Punitive Damages: A Half-Baked Reform?
Directive 2014/104/EU on private antitrust enforcement opted for the exclusion of punitive damages from the category of recoverable damages following a violation of antitrust law. This article will outline the concept of...
7th International PhD Students’ Conference on Competition Law Białystok, 10 October 2017
The 7th International PhD Students’ Conference on Competition Law took place on 10 October 2017 at the Faculty of Law of the University of Białystok (Poland). The Conference was organized by the Department of Public Eco...
Dragan Gajin, Tijana Kojovic Competition Law in Serbia,Kluwer Law International BV, Netherlands, 2017, 168 p. (book review)
Dragan Gajin, Tijana Kojovic Competition Law in Serbia,Kluwer Law International BV, Netherlands, 2017, 168 p. - In May 2017, Wolters Kluwer published the first monograph on Serbian competition law written in English. The...
Antitrust Liability in the Context of Online Platforms. Case Comment to the Preliminary Ruling of the Court of Justice of 21 January 2016 ‘Eturas’ UAB v Lietuvos Respublikos konkurencijos taryba (Case C-74/14)
In its judgment of 21 January 2016 in Case C-74/14 (hereinafter, judgment), the Court of Justice (hereinafter, CJ) responded to a preliminary question submitted by the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. The latte...
Fifth National Academic Conference ‘Consumer in the Rail Passenger Market’, Łódź, 9 May 2018
On 9 May 2018, the Fifth National Academic Conference ‘Consumer in the Rail Passenger Market’ was held at the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Łódź (WPiA UŁ). The event was organised by the Student...