PROCEDURAL STATUS OF A PLEDGER WITHIN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION AND THE WAYS OF IMPROVEMENT
Journal Title: Проблеми законності - Year 2018, Vol 142, Issue 142
Abstract
The author has studied the procedural status of a pledger within criminal proceedings and has formulated propositions to the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine in part of regulating the procedure for the application of personal surety. For this purpose, the author of the article has separately studied the issue of the procedure for involving a pledger. It has been indicated that the initiative on involving a pledger for criminal proceedings may be initiated by both a suspect, accused, on whom the issue of the application of a preventive measure is being decided, and by persons who wish to take the bail of a suspect, accused. Instead, an investigating judge, court may choose a preventive measure in the form of a personal surety only if a pledger agrees or his application for taking a bail of a suspect, accused. It has been stressed that the statutory requirements are the trust or special confidence of an investigating judge, court to a pledger. Trust and special confidence, above all, are the awareness of an investigating judge, court that a pledger can contribute to the achievement of the purpose of a preventive measure and the execution of the duties by a suspect, accused, and secondly, they are based on the special moral qualities of a pledger, his authority. It has been concluded that personal surety is a preventive measure far from perfect in terms of legal enforcement, since the legislator has not resolved a number of important issues. Consequently, it is necessary to improve the provisions of the Art. 180 of the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, and secondly, to regulate the procedural status of a pledger by amending the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine with a separate norm.
Authors and Affiliations
Тетяна Фоміна
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP401570
- DOI 10.21564/2414-990x.142.139941
- Views 101
- Downloads 0
Уголовно-исполнительный аспект сущности правового института
В статье рассматриваются и характеризуются правовые институты, субинституты и межотраслевые субинституты уголовно-исполнительного права, которые с точки зрения как юридической терминологии, так и определения содержания в...
Grounds acquittance from civil liability of the carrier for breach of contract of carriage passengers and baggage
The essence of the concepts of «force majeure» and «emergency» has been clarified, revealed their contents; individual circumstances as grounds for acquittance from the carrier’s civil liability with the practice of the...
ПРАВО НА СПРАВЕДЛИВИЙ СУДОВИЙ РОЗГЛЯД ТА СУЧАСНА МОДЕЛЬ ЦИВІЛЬНОГО ПРОЦЕСУ
Зроблено спробу відступити від усталеного підходу щодо характеристики сучасної моделі цивільного процесу суто з точки зору змагальних засад та запровадити новий, в основу якого покладені вимоги п. 1 ст. 6 Конвенції про з...
PRINCIPLE OF GOOD FAITH OF PARTICIPANTS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS AND PROHIBITION OF ABUSE OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL RIGHTS
The issues of the status of good faith of participants in civil proceedings as an independent principle are investigated, taking into account the degree of its legal regulation and the existence of a legislative prohibit...
Деякі теоретичні питання відновлення земель
<p><em>Розглянуто окремі теоретичні питання щодо відновлення земель як напряму їх охорони. Зроблено висновок, що суспільні відносини, які виникають з приводу відновлення земель, є самостійною складовою земельних відносин...