Prosociality in the economic Dictator Game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2020, Vol 15, Issue 1

Abstract

Is prosociality parochial or universalist? To shed light on this issue, we examine the relationship between the amount of money given to a stranger (giving in an incentivized Dictator Game) and intergroup attitudes and behavior in the context of randomly assigned teams (a minimal group paradigm) among N = 4,846 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers. Using a set of Dynamic Identity Diffusion Index measures, we find that participants who give more in the Dictator Game show less preferential identification with their team relative to the other team, and more identification with all participants regardless of team. Furthermore, in an incentivized Voter Game, participants who give more in the Dictator Game are more likely to support compromise by voting for the opposing team in order to avoid deadlock. Together, these results suggest that – at least in this subject pool and using these measures – prosociality is better characterized by universalism than parochialism.

Authors and Affiliations

Mohsen Mosleh, Alexander J. Stewart, Joshua B. Plotkin and David G. Rand

Keywords

Related Articles

Does telling white lies signal pro-social preferences?

The opportunity to tell a white lie (i.e., a lie that benefits another person) generates a moral conflict between two opposite moral dictates, one pushing towards telling the truth always and the other pushing towards he...

Why do professional athletes have different time preferences than non-athletes?

The objective of this paper is to measure and compare the subjective time discounting of professional athletes and non-athletes. By using a questionnaire, we found higher subjective discounting for professional athletes...

Numeracy, frequency, and Bayesian reasoning

Previous research has demonstrated that Bayesian reasoning performance is improved if uncertainty information is presented as natural frequencies rather than single-event probabilities. A questionnaire study of 342 colle...

How do defendants choose their trial court? Evidence for a heuristic processing account

In jurisdictions with two or more tiers of criminal courts, some defendants can choose the type of trial court to be tried in. This may involve a trade-off between the probability of acquittal/conviction and the estimate...

Response dynamics: A new window on the decision process

The history of judgment and decision making is defined by a trend toward increasingly nuanced explanations of the decision making process. Recently, process models have become incredibly sophisticated, yet the tools avai...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678455
  • DOI -
  • Views 142
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mohsen Mosleh, Alexander J. Stewart, Joshua B. Plotkin and David G. Rand (2020). Prosociality in the economic Dictator Game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(1), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-678455