Prospective clinical study on visual outcome following uveitis

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology - Year 2016, Vol 2, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction: Uveitis is one of the most common form of intraocular inflammation causing vision loss either directly or via complications such as cataract, glaucoma, macular edema and others. Aims and objectives: 1. To evaluate the etiology, clinical features, systemic associations and Severity of uveitis. 2. To analyse the visual outcome following uveitis. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study which includes 80 patients with anterior uveitis of various etiologies presented to our department at Thanjavur medical college from July 2014 – September 2015. They were subjected to detailed clinical examination and relevant investigations. A proforma was drawn up and following details were recorded for each patient: age and sex, history related to trauma, surgery and specific systemic associations of uveitis, clinical examination of signs and symptoms of uveitis including general systemic examination. They were treated and reviewed according to the severity of uveitis and followed up for a period of three months. According to improvement / worsening of the disease activity they were further managed. Observation and Results: The ratio of uveitis in male to female is 1.66:1 with 96.25% unilateral and 3.75% bilateral presentation. With regard to etiology 17.5% had idiopathic, 8.75% infective, 47.50% traumatic, 5% lens induced and 21.25% postoperative uveitis. Vision loss accounted in 7.5% due to cataract, 6.25% due to macular edema and 10% due to glaucoma. Visual outcome improved in 91.25% of these patients. Blindness due to anterior uveitis is 1.25%. Conclusion: Uveitis continues to be the major cause of ocular morbidity. But patients get good final visual outcome with detailed clinical examination and initiation of proper management. Cases presented earlier even with severe uveitis had favourable response to treatment and good prognosis in visual outcome than those presented late with uveitic sequalae and with co-morbid risk factors irrespective of etiology.

Authors and Affiliations

Raja Rengaraj, Thaialnayaki Vellaichamy

Keywords

Related Articles

Vitamin A deficiency in chronic kidney disease patients attending a tertiary care hospital

Background: Patients with Chronic kidney Disease are at the risk of developing a deficiency or excess of one or more micronutrients because of inadequate intake, interference of micronutrient absorption either by drug or...

Phaco chop versus stop and chop nucleotomy techniques: A comparative evaluation

To perform a comparative evaluation of phaco chop versus stop and chop nucleotomy techniques in phacoemulsificationMaterials and Methods 60 patients with uncomplicated senile cataract were included in this study which we...

Comparison of macular thickness in myopia, hypermetropia and emmetropia: An OCT based study

Aim To make a comparative evaluation of macular thickness in myopia and hypermetropia versus emmetropiaMaterials and Methods A crosssectional OCT based study was done in randomly selected 100 emmetropes 93 myopes 67 hype...

Comparison of ocular blood flow by doppler evaluation in middle aged type 2 diabetes patients with and without diabetic macular edema

Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) has estimated that the number of people diagnosed with Diabetes is 347 million worldwide. Diabetic macular edema (DME) and Diabetic Retinopathy are the main causes of vis...

Significance of van herick test and its comparison with gonioscopy grading

Van Herick test is done to assess the occludability of anterior chamber angle by estimating peripheral anterior chamber depth in fraction of corneal thickness during a routine slit lamp examination. This method is also r...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP241597
  • DOI -
  • Views 100
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Raja Rengaraj, Thaialnayaki Vellaichamy (2016). Prospective clinical study on visual outcome following uveitis. Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2(4), 323-326. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-241597