Przegląd orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego oraz Trybunału Konstytucyjnego

Journal Title: Radca Prawny. Zeszyty naukowe - Year 2019, Vol 20, Issue 3

Abstract

The Polish Constitutional Tribunal issued an important decision regarding the exercise of the profession of an attorney-at-law, regarding the resolution of doubts as to the possibility of filing a complaint against the actions of the Disciplinary Proceedings Representative of the Bar Association of Attorneys-at-Law. In addition, the Tribunal ruled that the Article 138 of the Act of May 20, 1971 – Polish Code of Offenses, in the part containing the words “or intentionally refuses to perform the service to which they are obliged without a justified reason”, is not constitutional. Moreover, through a judgment of June 3, 2019, the Polish Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary complaint (to appeal a final decision of a common court or military court) of the Polish Public Prosecutor General, recognizing that damages agreements resulting from the court proceedings can determine attorney’s fees, relative to the amount awarded by the court to the plaintiff, i.e. the applicable success fee is allowed by the Polish law. The Supreme Court, composed of seven judges, also adopted a resolution in which it indicated that the buyer of a claim for compensation for motor accident is entitled to a reimbursement of justified costs of an expert’s opinion commissioned to a third party only if its creation was necessary in the circumstances of the case for the effective recovery of damages.

Authors and Affiliations

Kacper Mirosław Milkowski

Keywords

Related Articles

Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z 22 listopada 2016 r., K 13/15

This article pertains to the judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal, in which the Tribunal – acting upon application of the Polish Ombudsman – adjudicated that Article 12(1)–(2) of the Family and Guardianship Code (FGC)...

Glosa do wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie z 23 października 2015 r., I ACa 185/15

The gloss concerns selected aspects of compensation for the damages in the form of a rent for a replacement vehicle, especially with the perpetrator’s third-party liability (TPL) insurance. It is most often an element of...

Od redakcji

Szanowni Państwo, oddajemy wam kolejny, dziewiętnasty już numer czasopisma „Radca Prawny. Zeszyty Naukowe”. Jako Redakcja chcemy, aby nasze publikacje były dla Państwa jednym ze źródeł informacji wykorzystywanych nie ty...

Pozorność, zakaz użyczenia formy aktu notarialnego czynności i czynności częściowo odpłatne

The article concerns various problems resulting from gross inequivalence of performances, especially mixed gifts. Moreover, the problems of the lending of the form of a simulated legal act to the dissimulated one, primar...

Konstytucyjne ograniczenia wolności zgromadzeń podczas stanów nadzwyczajnych

From a legal point of view, the essence of any state of emergency, including an emergency, is that it is introduced in a situation of a particular threat where regular, ordinary legal measures and state institutions are...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP640404
  • DOI -
  • Views 99
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kacper Mirosław Milkowski (2019). Przegląd orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego oraz Trybunału Konstytucyjnego. Radca Prawny. Zeszyty naukowe, 20(3), 151-188. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-640404