REASONS CONCERNING THE RESTRICTION OF SOME RIGHTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ART. 53 OF CONSTITUTION

Abstract

An essential dimension of the lawful state is represented by the consecration and guaranteeing of the fundamental rights and liberties, the ensuring of the optimum conditions for their exercising. The state authorities have the negative obligation to restrain from any arbitrary or excessive requirement that may restrict or condition the exercise of the constitutional right. In order to be legitimate and constitutional, any restriction of the exercise of the fundamental rights and liberties through the measures prescribed by the state’s authorities, needs to have the character of exemption, not to affect the substance of the law and to fulfill all conditions stipulated by article 53 of Constitution. In relation to these premises we analyze in this study the constitutional institution of restraining some rights’ exercising and the relevant aspects of jurisprudence. The observance of the principle of proportionality is one of the constitutional requirements in order that such a restrictive measure be legitimate. The main particularities of the principle of proportionality applied in the matter of restraining some rights’ exercising are analyzed with reference to the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human’s Rights.

Authors and Affiliations

Marius ANDREESCU, Claudia ANDREESCU

Keywords

Related Articles

PROTECTION OF THE WASTE REGIME BY CRIMINAL LAW. ACTUAL SITUATION IN ROMANIA

In this paper, the author discusses the main weaknesses of the incrimination provided by article 63 of Romanian Law no.211/2011, regarding the waste regime, in its actual state, as a result of legislation changes that oc...

CONSTITUTION AND CONSTITUTIONALISM CONTEMPORARY ISSUE

In a democratic society, the judicial legitimacy of the state and its power, of its institutions, but also the social and political grounds are generated and determined by the Constitution, defined as expressively as pos...

A BRIEF ANALYSIS ON BREXIT’S CONSEQUENCES ON THE CJEU’S JURISDICTION

As the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland’s effective withdrawal from the European Union advances, there is a growing interest on what solutions shall be found for the complex legal problems raised by B...

THE TERM OF “RELEVANT MARKET”, AS ELEMENT OF DOMINANT POSITION PROVIDED BY ART. 102 OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

The term of relevant market was used for the first time in the Sherman Act of 1890, condemning monopolies or monopoly attempts. The term of relevant market is analyzed as being the place where demand and supply of produc...

PARTICULARITIES OF CIVIL ACTION IN THE CASE OF FRAUD BY BANK CREDIT CONTRACTS

The crime of fraud is one of the most important threats facing the contemporary Romanian society. One of the most common ways of fraud is fraud through credit agreements. Of course, as in any criminal proceedings, in thi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP298134
  • DOI -
  • Views 135
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Marius ANDREESCU, Claudia ANDREESCU (2017). REASONS CONCERNING THE RESTRICTION OF SOME RIGHTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ART. 53 OF CONSTITUTION. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 9(11), 347-355. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-298134