REDPATH ON THE NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY

Journal Title: Studia Gilsoniana - Year 2016, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

In this article the author discusses Peter A. Redpath’s understanding of the nature of philosophy and his account of how erroneous understandings of philosophy have led to the decline of the West and to the separation of philosophy from modern science and modern science from wisdom. Following Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas, Redpath argues that philosophy is a sense realism because it begins in wonder about real things known through the senses. Philosophy presupposes pre-philosophical knowledge, common sense, which consists of principles rooted in sensation that make human experience, sense wonder, and philosophy possible. Philosophy is certain knowledge demonstrated through causes and thus philosophy is the same as science. Redpath understands science as a habit that we acquire through repeated practice. More precisely, a scientific habit is a simple quality of the intellect that enables us to demonstrate (prove) the necessary properties of a genus through their causes or principles. In this way, science is the study of the one and the many. Redpath argues that metaphysics is the final cause of the arts and sciences, providing the foundation for all of the arts and sciences and justifying their principles. Finally, he argues that with modernity’s loss of belief in God and its rejection of metaphysics as a science, utopian socialism has become an historical/political substitute for metaphysics.

Authors and Affiliations

Robert A. Delfino

Keywords

Related Articles

The Thomistic Perception of the Person and Human Rights

The idea of human rights is connected to the modern perception of law founded on subjectivity, in the context of which rights are authorizations of individual action versus a higher authority, resulting in a subjectivity...

DLACZEGO GILSON? DLACZEGO TERAZ?

The author identifies and discusses the most important elements of Étienne Gilson’s thought which emanate out of his articulation and defense of the Western Creed. To the question: why Gilson, why now?, the author offers...

LOS PADRES CAPADOCIOS Y EL CONCEPTO DE PERSONA

The thought of the Cappadocian fathers is linked to the Trinitarian nature of God. They strive for formulating a definition of divine person. The extent of the Cappadocian notion of person covers two other important idea...

THE CULTURAL DANGERS OF SCIENTISM AND COMMON SENSE SOLUTIONS

In his article the author begins by defining what is meant by ‘science’ and ‘scientism.’ Sec-ond, he discusses some of the cultural dangers of scientism. Third, he gives several arguments why scientism should be rejected...

THE SPECTACLE OF REDEMPTION: GUILT AND VIOLENCE IN MARTIN SCORSESE’S RAGING BULL

Of all the characters that undertake a search for redemption in Martin Scorsese’s films, perhaps it is the story of Jake La Motta in Raging Bull that for many reasons presents the greatest challenge to understanding rede...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP253188
  • DOI -
  • Views 220
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Robert A. Delfino (2016). REDPATH ON THE NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY. Studia Gilsoniana, 5(1), 33-53. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-253188