Reluctant altruism and peer pressure in charitable giving

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2012, Vol 8, Issue 1

Abstract

Subjects donate individually (control group) or in pairs (treatment group). Those in pairs reveal their donation decision to each other. Average donations in the treatment group are significantly higher than in the control group. Paired subjects have the opportunity to revise their donation decision after discussion. Pair members shift toward each others’ initial decisions. Subjects are happier with their decision when their donations are larger, but those in pairs are less happy, controlling for amount donated. These findings suggest reluctant altruism due to peer pressure in charitable giving.

Authors and Affiliations

Diane Reyniers and Richa Bhalla

Keywords

Related Articles

A shift in strategy or “error”? Strategy classification over multiple stochastic specifications

We present a classification methodology that jointly assigns to a decision maker a best-fitting decision strategy for a set of choice data as well as a best-fitting stochastic specification of that decision strategy. Our...

Predictions on the go: Prevalence of spontaneous spending predictions

The present research examines the prevalence of predictions in daily life. Specifically we examine whether spending predictions for specific purchases occur spontaneously in life outside of a laboratory setting. Across c...

Facing expectations: Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard.

We argue that people choosing prosocial distribution of goods (e.g., in dictator games) make this choice because they do not want to disappoint their partner rather than because of a direct preference for the chosen pros...

Preference for increasing wages: How do people value various streams of income?

Prior studies have found that subjects prefer an improving sequence of income over a constant sequence, even if the constant sequence offers a larger present-discounted value. However, little is known about how these pre...

How different types of participant payments alter task performance

Researchers typically use incentives (such as money or course credit) in order to obtain participants who engage in the specific behaviors of interest to the researcher. There is, however, little understanding or agreeme...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678037
  • DOI -
  • Views 123
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Diane Reyniers and Richa Bhalla (2012). Reluctant altruism and peer pressure in charitable giving. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(1), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-678037