Reluctant altruism and peer pressure in charitable giving

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2012, Vol 8, Issue 1

Abstract

Subjects donate individually (control group) or in pairs (treatment group). Those in pairs reveal their donation decision to each other. Average donations in the treatment group are significantly higher than in the control group. Paired subjects have the opportunity to revise their donation decision after discussion. Pair members shift toward each others’ initial decisions. Subjects are happier with their decision when their donations are larger, but those in pairs are less happy, controlling for amount donated. These findings suggest reluctant altruism due to peer pressure in charitable giving.

Authors and Affiliations

Diane Reyniers and Richa Bhalla

Keywords

Related Articles

Different heuristics and same bias: A spectral analysis of biased judgments and individual decision rules

We used correlation and spectral analyses to investigate the cognitive structures and processes producing biased judgments. We used 5 different sets of driving problems to exemplify problems that trigger biases, specific...

Editorial: Methodology in judgment and decision making research

In this introduction to the special issue on methodology, we provide background on its original motivation and a systematic overview of the contributions. The latter are discussed with correspondence to the phase of the...

Tailored proper scoring rules elicit decision weights

Proper scoring rules are scoring methods that incentivize honest reporting of subjective probabilities, where an agent strictly maximizes his expected score by reporting his true belief. The implicit assumption behind pr...

Genetic testing and risk interpretation: How do women understand lifetime risk results?

Genetic screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 gives women the opportunity for early detection, surveillance, and intervention. One key feature of genetic testing and counseling is the provision of personal lifetime risk. However...

A marketing science perspective on recognition-based heuristics (and the fast-and-frugal paradigm)

Marketing science seeks to prescribe better marketing strategies (advertising, product development, pricing, etc.). To do so we rely on models of consumer decisions grounded in empirical observations. Field experience su...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678037
  • DOI -
  • Views 143
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Diane Reyniers and Richa Bhalla (2012). Reluctant altruism and peer pressure in charitable giving. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(1), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-678037