Remarks on the Letter of the Patriarch Theophylact to Tsar Peter in the Context of Certain Byzantine and Slavic Anti-heretic Texts
Journal Title: Studia Ceranea. Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Centre for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-East Europe - Year 2013, Vol 3, Issue
Abstract
The Letter of patriarch Theophylact to tsar Peter is the oldest, but seemingly not the most informative Greek source for the history of Bogomilism. It is in essence a standard document, a typical product of the patriarch’s chancery; it is not conceived as an in-depth investigation into the theological minutiae pertaining to the cosmogony, dogmas and social doctrines of the heretics and the orthodox Church, but rather as a practical tutorial on how to thwart any given neo-Manichaean dualist heresy. It brings to light the fact that Bogomilism, the ‘new’ heresy was treated as an ‘old’ one – as a ‘reactivation’ of earlier gnostic-dualist and neo-Manichaean movements. The letter also features a peculiar innovative feature, though not one directly related to the Bogomil heresy itself: the degree of commitment to preaching the dogmas of the heresy is used for differentiating the situation of the followers. The analysis of the Letter of patriarch Theophylact to tsar Peter raises the more general issue concerning the detailed study of Byzantine and Slavic liturgical texts as a source of information on neo-Manichaean doctrines.
Authors and Affiliations
Georgi Minczew
From the Editorial Board
From the Editorial Board.
Book Reviews: Anna Kotłowska, Zwierzęta w kulturze literackiej Bizantyńczyków [Animals in Byzantine literary culture] – ᾽Αναβλέψατε εἰς τα πετεινὰ..., Wydawnictwo UAM, Poznań 2013, pp. 262.
Book Review.
Book Reviews: Jacek Bonarek, Bizancjum w dobie bitwy pod Mantzikert. Znaczenie zagrożenia seldżuckiego w polityce bizantyńskiej w XI wieku [Byzantium in the Times of the Battle of Mantzikert. Significance of the Seljuk Threat in the Byzantine Policy of 11th Century], Towarzystwo Wydawnicze “Historia Iagellonica”, Kraków 2011, pp. 296 [= Notos – Scripta Antiqua et Byzantina, 7].
Book Review.
Fund Collection through Litigation by the State Treasury in the Roman Empire (with Special Reference to the First Three Centuries A.D.)
The paper discusses the confiscation of property (publicatio bonorum) as a source of revenue for the fiscus in ancient Rome. The term fiscus means, among other things, the public property, State funds, but also the priva...
Book Reviews: Luigi Santagati, Storia dei Bizantini di Sicilia, Edizioni Lussografica Caltanissetta, Caltanisetta 2012, pp. 421.
Book Review.