Restytucja mienia objętego działaniem tzw. dekretu Bieruta z 26 października 1945 r. w świetle działań Komisji do spraw reprywatyzacji nieruchomości warszawskich
Journal Title: Radca Prawny. Zeszyty naukowe - Year 2018, Vol 16, Issue 3
Abstract
The nationalization process that took place in Poland was driven by the political ideals of communism and, in principle, did not include compensating former owners. The issue of reprivatization, understood as the return of seized property or payment of compensation, has yet to be solved. In order to restore the protection of the public interest by remedying the infringements of law committed while issuing decisions on the basis of the provisions of the Decree of 26 October 1945 on the Ownership and Usage of Real Estate within Limits of the Capital City of Warsaw (known as the Bierut Decree), the Specific Rules for Removing Legal Effects of Reprivatization Decisions Concerning Warsaw Real Estate Issued in Violation of Law Act of 9 March 2017 has been adopted. The immediate effectiveness of the orders issued by the Commission for Reprivatization of Warsaw Real Estate, which provides the basis for entries into section III of land and mortgage registers, and the final nature of the Commission’s decisions, which enables entries into section II of land and mortgage registers only seven days from their publishing on the website of the office supporting the Minister of Justice, violate the principle of reliance on public records in land and mortgage registers. Defining the Commission’s matters as urgent and precluding the possibility of reconciling the status of the entries disclosed in land and mortgage registers with the actual legal status in the course of a trial, as well as the exclusion of the application of various principles governing administrative proceedings, raise questions about the significance of the Commissions’ operations to real estate trade and the rights of its participants. Whether the Commission succeeds in overcoming the absence of systemic reprivatization regulations is an open question.
Authors and Affiliations
Mirosława Pytlewska-Smółka
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP594543
- DOI -
- Views 96
- Downloads 0
Ustawa o zarządzie sukcesyjnym przedsiębiorstwem osoby fizycznej – nowa regulacja sukcesji przedsiębiorstwa
The Act on the Succession Management of a Natural Person’s Company entered into force in November 2018. It introduced new legal institutions into the Polish legal system: inheritance of a company and succession managemen...
Legitymacja czynna Przewodniczącego Komisji Nadzoru Finansowego w postępowaniu przed Sądem Najwyższym
The article concerns the powers granted to the Chair of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (hereinafter “Chair of the PFSA”) in proceedings before the Supreme Court pursuant to Articles 83 and 89 of the Act of De...
Instytucja wydziedziczenia w świetle orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego i sądów powszechnych
The article presents the essence and premises of disinheritance based on the case law of the Supreme Court and general jurisdiction courts. In addition, the author discusses the issue of forgiveness – and in particular i...
Glosa do wyroku NSA w Warszawie z dnia 26 kwietnia 2017 r. II FSK 1440/16
The judgment commented upon applies to one of the essential issues concerning exemptions from corporate income tax, namely the exemption for income from business activity carried out in a special economic zone. In tax pr...
Wpływ orzecznictwa ETPCz na tle art. 1 Protokołu nr 1 do Konwencji o Ochronie Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności sporządzonego w Paryżu 20 marca 1952 r. na rozwiązania systemowe, treść i ochronę prawa własności w polskim systemie prawnym
The article attempts to analyze several significant decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) issued in Polish cases based on Article 1 of the judicature based on article 1 of the Protocol 1 to the European...