ЩОДО РОЗМЕЖУВАННЯ ПОНЯТЬ «МЕДІАЦІЯ», «ДОСУДОВЕ УРЕГУЛЮВАННЯ СПОРУ» ТА «УРЕГУЛЮВАННЯ СПОРУ ЗА УЧАСТЮ СУДДІ»
Journal Title: Південноукраїнський правничий часопис - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 1
Abstract
The article distinguishes between such alternative dispute resolution measures as mediation, pre-trial settlement of disputes and settlement of disputes involving a judge. It is proved that these terms are often regarded by researchers and practicing lawyers as identical. The concept and basic principles of the concepts “mediation”, “pre-trial settlement of a dispute” and “settlement of a dispute involving a judge” concepts are investigated. There are six characteristics used in order to differ above-mentioned concepts namely: by regulation sources; by subject (participants in the settlement of the dispute); by procedure; by arrangement; by the timing of; by consequences. It is revealed that mediation in Ukraine currently has practically no legal regulation. In particular, the draft Law of Ukraine “On Mediation” was submitted at the beginning of 2019 for adoption in the second reading to the Parliament. According to this draft Law, the mediator is an independent person that helps the parties to find a compromise facilitating agreement between the parties but not to resolve the dispute itself. The choice of a mediator is carried out by the parties jointly and arbitrary. The pre-trial settlement of economic disputes is carried out on the basis of the Economic Code of Ukraine through the lettering of the parties. One party (the applicant) sends another party (the recipient) the letter of claim, containing all the applicant’s claims and their legal grounds. Thus, in this kind of the out-ofcourt settlement, the search for a compromise is carried out by the parties themselves without the involvement of any other persons. The settlement of a dispute involving a judge is made by agreement of the parties prior to the commencement of the consideration of the case on the merits by the judge-rapporteur. This option is available regardless of the composition of the court. Such a settlement is carried out in the form of joint and (or) closed meetings. The person judge in this kind of the settlement is identified by the automatic case distribution system of the court. So the parties are not empowered to choose the judge arbitrary. However, if there is no amicable agreement as an outcome of the settlement of the dispute involving a judge, the case is to be transferred to another judge. Another one settlement of the dispute involving a judge is not allowed.
Authors and Affiliations
Т. В. Степанова
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP607964
- DOI -
- Views 61
- Downloads 0
КОНЦЕПТУАЛІЗАЦІЯ ТИМЧАСОВОГО ВИЛУЧЕННЯ МАЙНА В КРИМІНАЛЬНОМУ ПРОВАДЖЕННІ
The specifics and problems of the grounds for temporary seizure of property in criminal proceedings in Ukraine are analyzed; the content of the concept of “temporary seizure of property” is determined and the emphasis is...
ЗНАЧЕННЯ ПОЛОЖЕНЬ ХАРТІЇ ОСНОВНИХ ПРАВ ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКОГО СОЮЗУ ДЛЯ МОДЕРНІЗАЦІЇ ЗАКРІПЛЕНИХ У КОНСТИТУЦІЇ УКРАЇНИ ПРАВ І СВОБОД ЛЮДИНИ
The author, based on the analysis of the provisions of the Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union set out the level of international law guaranteeing fundamental human rights and norms which povinnosti a mod...
ПРАВОВЕ РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ АНТИДЕМПІНГОВОГО МИТА В УКРАЇНІ
The antidumping duty is a type of customs duty applicable in Ukraine. The general features of antidumping duty are: the tax nature, the obligation and the conditionality of payment by the fact of moving goods across the...
КРУЇЗ ЯК ДОГОВІР ПРО НАДАННЯ ТУРИСТИЧНИХ ПОСЛУГ
This article considers a cruise as a contract for the provision of travel services. The author’s definition of a contract for the provision of travel services is proposed: under a contract for the provision of travel ser...
МІЖНАРОДНО-ПРАВОВЕ ЗОБОВ’ЯЗАННЯ ДЕРЖАВ ЩОДО НЕВИДАЧІ СТОСОВНО ШУКАЧІВ ПРИТУЛКУ
The article deals with the problem of non-refoulement of asylum-seekers. While it is a well-established rule of international law that refugees may not be refouled (deported) to a state, where they may be persecuted or w...